For your information only, read or discard as you see fit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: 100American
Why can’t two non-gay brothers marry, for that matter - as a tax strategy, for example.
2 posted on
10/23/2015 8:44:51 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
To: 100American
The horse is out of the barn and anything goes. Same sex marriage supporters have no principle they can point to and say “we can’t have this”. I can foresee a father “marrying” his son and thereby avoiding inheritance taxes.
To: 100American
And here I thought after the Obama Gang and Pope Francis, nothing more could ever shock me.
To: 100American
Next folks will demand to marry their pets.
I guess there are just too many who have forgotten the words of God...one man, one woman.
To: 100American
11 posted on
10/23/2015 8:53:00 PM PDT by
Dallas59
(Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
To: 100American
I predicted years ago, on this board that in the near future a very wealth man would attempt to marry a son or daughter in order to avoid probate and inheritance taxes. There is no longer a ,moral or ethical reason to stop such marriages.
Finally we have found a way to eliminate the death tax!
12 posted on
10/23/2015 8:53:55 PM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: 100American
Anything other than man/wife is ofensive to the very nature of what marriage is.
The definition is not any two people in lust and/or wanting legal benefits and to pay the marriage penalty.
Inmates runing all stratas of the asylum. Cwii cant come fast enough the way i feel today.
13 posted on
10/23/2015 8:55:27 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: 100American
Mental illness on display.
16 posted on
10/23/2015 8:59:36 PM PDT by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:21)
To: 100American
Why not...it shouldn’t affect their kids.
17 posted on
10/23/2015 8:59:49 PM PDT by
o-n-money
(We should rename California to Newer Mexico.)
To: 100American
let'em all marry each other...I am emotionally separating from the evil Satanists sheeple....
I just wish these 24/7 debauchery wouldn't take so much of my paycheck..
18 posted on
10/23/2015 9:00:24 PM PDT by
cherry
To: 100American
So, will this be discrimination against brother/sister marriage by allowing brother/brother marriage?
After all, it is all about making gays happy isn’t it?
23 posted on
10/23/2015 9:10:29 PM PDT by
umgud
(v)
To: 100American
Why not? EVERYTHING else, every other combination of people, is a-ok in Kalifornia.
24 posted on
10/23/2015 9:11:47 PM PDT by
originalbuckeye
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: 100American
Well there's the end of Western Christian civilization for sure. Incestuous homosexual marriage. Good God Almighty.
25 posted on
10/23/2015 9:13:50 PM PDT by
jmacusa
To: 100American
What about cousins?
26 posted on
10/23/2015 9:33:43 PM PDT by
Rodamala
To: 100American
Actually, the concept of a future time when debauchery knows no bounds was predicted long ago.....
2 Timothy 3:13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
27 posted on
10/23/2015 9:38:30 PM PDT by
hecticskeptic
(In life it's important to know what you believeÂ….but more more importantly, why you believe it.)
To: 100American
To: 100American
When one of them decides to identify as a female then they are no longer legally “brothers” so that throws yet another wrench in it. Slippery slope.
30 posted on
10/23/2015 9:52:38 PM PDT by
bgill
( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: 100American
And that only begs the next obvious question...Once upon a time, somebody heard the phrase "begs the question," and liked it, and started using it, and didn't bother to find out what it means. And from that single moron, tens of millions of boobs have picked it up.
32 posted on
10/23/2015 10:14:20 PM PDT by
Arthur McGowan
(Beau Biden's funeral, attended by Bp. Malooly, Card. McCarrick, and Papal Nuncio, Abp. Vigano.)
To: 100American
The cats out of the bag. Now marriage must have no restraints. A man should be able to marry a dog and woman should be able to marry a donkey.
Now anything goes.
33 posted on
10/23/2015 11:11:32 PM PDT by
ColdSteelTalon
(Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
To: 100American
Yep— I framed the same argument but with a Biblical perspective. If the definition of marriage is changed one way, it can be changed a whole lot of other ways. The Bible is very clear about gay sex and incest. Fools ignore it at their own peril.
34 posted on
10/23/2015 11:25:05 PM PDT by
tflabo
(Psalm 1)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson