Posted on 10/22/2015 3:39:17 PM PDT by jazusamo
Instead of opposing racial classifications and racial division, the Obama administration is doing what it does best: taking sides against American traditions of equality and unity.
On Friday, a federal judge in Hawaii will rule whether a racially discriminatory election that only allows one race to participate may take place in November. The Obama administration filed a brief as a friend of the court saying that the racially discriminatory election should take place.
Hawaii passed a law to empower the native Hawaiian movement by establishing a government-run voter registration roll that only allows native Hawaiians to register to vote. The laws purpose is to provide for and to implement the recognition of the Native Hawaiian people by means and methods that will facilitate their self-governance.
The law allows for an election to select delegates to a convention, which would then draft the governance documents of a Native Hawaiian entity. The roll of qualified Native Hawaiians will result in a convention of qualified Native Hawaiians, established for the purpose of organizing themselves.
The authors of the law seem to have never heard of Appomattox.
The election of delegates to the convention is set to take place next month unless federal district court judge J. Michael Seabright blocks the racially exclusionary election on Friday. Judicial Watch has sought to block the election.
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch said the Constitution still applies to the the State of Hawaii. It is shameful that it has taken a federal lawsuit to remind both Hawaiian officials and the Obama administration about the rule of the law.
The native Hawaiian separatist movement relies on the familiar narrative that the establishment of Hawaii as a state is illegitimate. After all, American corporate interests overthrew Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, and imperialism wiped out legitimate Hawaiian self-governance, or so the story goes.
Similar separatist efforts are underway in Guam.
Instead of opposing racial classifications and racial division, the Obama administration is doing what it does best: taking sides against American traditions of equality and unity.
In a brief filed by the Department of the Interior, the Obama administration squarely takes the side of the racial classifications and those defending the separatist election.
The Obama administration characterizes the nativist movement in Hawaii as akin to an Indian tribe recognized as such by Congress, which it isnt.
As explained below, in accordance with Federal law, tribes in the continental United States routinely limit voting in tribal elections, including constitutional referenda, to members, while excluding non-Natives. There is no principled basis for treating the Native Hawaiian community differently.
No principled basis? Heres a start: Congress never passed a law to treat native Hawaiians like an Indian tribe like that pesky Constitution requires. Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 clearly gives Congress alone the power to answer questions related to the status of an Indian tribe. Congress has repeatedly rejected efforts to treat native Hawaiians like good old fashioned stateside Indians.
Only in the Obama administration would a lawyer file a pleading with a court saying there is no principled basis when the Constitution itself provides a principled basis.
But the Obama lawyers go even further and have no gripe with the racially exclusionary elections. Why should they? After all, this is a gang thats regularly on the wrong side of questions of racial equality. Theyve even drafted rules to give validity to the racially exclusionary election. The brief:
The proposed rule places few conditions on the drafting of a governing document that might be presented to the Department in the process of reestablishing a government-to-government relationship, merely stating that the governing document should be based on meaningful input from representative segments of the Native Hawaiian community and reflect the will of [that] community.
This is a question for Congress to decide, not a small band of lawyer-activists inside the Obama administration who enable a racial separatist movement in Hawaii. Well see Friday if the racially exclusionary election is allowed to take place.
I never understood that even some Alaskan native practice this s***t I never understood it Alaska or Hawaii
I wonder if those whose roots go back to the CSA would get the same support from that POS.
Disgusting pukes!
When is this bastard getting impeached? ???
How is this scenario. Hawaii secedes. No longer part of the USA. Also no extradition. Baraq finished his term and moves there. He is declared the dear leader. Washington severs all financial aid. Just think, baraq will have his own Cuba. King of the dung heap.
I hear you! He should have been long ago.
OTOH, a vast empire, a collection of disparate, dissenting peoples constantly at each others throats requires an authoritarian strongman at the top who rules through force.
America 2015 is not a republic, but we still have time to reclaim it.
******************************
Scum sucking swine.
Look at his eyes....
Lights are on but noooooobody home....
BUMP!
Balkanization at its best...Next big push will be for “native” moslems to vote on sharia...
:)
This is blatant advocacy of bigotry by the 0bama administration, and should be smacked down hard by any judicial body worth its salt.
I agree, and that thought came to mind when first reading this piece.
First thing that popped into my head while reading the article. How much of the skim from the craps table will the Sec of Interior get in the end. Or did Chief HulaHula say,”my offer is Nothing, not even the fee for the gaming license, which I would appreciate you would put up personally.”
Anything to divide, antagonize and destroy Free America. What a traitor.
Disgusting pukes!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.