Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Biggirl

Waiting for Trump followers that once considered this nonsense the stuff of conspiracy, InfoWars truthers and paulbots to suddenly agree because it is “the Donald” saying it.


20 posted on 10/20/2015 9:28:07 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Longbow1969

A lot of people’s eyes have been opened since then, about the Bushes and Republicans in general.


23 posted on 10/20/2015 9:28:55 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Longbow1969

Trump is the new Ron Paul but he is good for the media


39 posted on 10/20/2015 9:37:56 AM PDT by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Longbow1969

We know it’s coming again. It’s just a matter of time.

And what are we doing about it?

Inviting as many of them in as we can.

Whose fault isn’t it going to be next time?


41 posted on 10/20/2015 9:38:03 AM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Longbow1969

Waiting for the Bush-bots on this forum to explain what is so conspiratorial about basic stuff like:

“The Bush White House ignored even more warnings about September 11 than we thought, according to journalist Kurt Eichenwald, who has a column in the NYT and a new book out today.

We already knew about the presidential brief from Aug. 6, 2001 that was titled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” The White House has shown that this declassified document was primarily a history of Al Qaeda, not a warning of imminent attack.

But there were other briefings, some seen by Eichenwald, that did warn of an imminent attack.

On May 1 the CIA said that a terrorist group in the U.S. was planning an attack.

On June 22 it warned that this attack was “imminent.”

On June 29 the brief warned of near-term attacks with “dramatic consequences” including major casualties.

On July 1, the briefing said that the terrorist attack had been delayed but “will occur soon.”

On July 24, the president was told again that the attack had been delayed but would occur within months.”

http://www.businessinsider.com/new-report-shows-how-many-warnings-about-bin-laden-were-ignored-by-the-bush-white-house-2012-9

Blame Bush or don’t blame Bush, but you can’t sit there and claim that they had fears of an impending attack as a major priority. Even after 911, the SAME immigration policies and refusal to enforce the law that enabled 911 was kept in place.


59 posted on 10/20/2015 9:46:03 AM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Longbow1969

That’s already happened, most of his supporters fell in line with it like he threw a switch. They’re sycophants.


136 posted on 10/20/2015 10:25:52 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson