Pretty clear how the Huffington Post feels about it:
“U.S. Staying In Afghanistan Through End Of 2017... Thousands Of Troops... Obama Handing Off Conflict To Successor... Previously Promised To End It In 2014... 14 Years Of War... UN: Taliban’s Reach Widest Since 2001... Afghanistan Not Mentioned In Dem Debate...”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
Sure why should they discuss it, they intend to continue to blame Bush.... Only way to halt this is for us to have a real leader that pushes back against the leftwinger media
The HuffPo article is very “useful”. It begins by saying that the Administration’s new argument is that staying means things are going well, and repeating the old saw that “there is no military solution”.
Back in 2004, I remember on the Swift Boat Vets site one of the vets saying of John Kerry “My God, even Stephen Seagall doesn’t have the stones to lie like that.”
It seems we can add most of the (other) members of this administration to that.
The HuffPo article is very “useful”. It begins by saying that the Administration’s new argument is that staying means things are going well, and repeating the old saw that “there is no military solution”.
Back in 2004, I remember on the Swift Boat Vets site one of the vets saying of John Kerry “My God, even Stephen Seagall doesn’t have the stones to lie like that.”
It seems we can add most of the (other) members of this administration to that.