Time to Knock the Supremes Down a Peg or Three

crisismagazine.com ^ | OCTOBER 2, 2015 | AUSTIN RUSE

[Monorprise]

Besides doing something about certain lawless decisions made by our black-robed masters, something must also be done about how we came to such a place where they can cast their gaze across the fruited plain and whatever catches their fancy becomes the law of the land, indeed higher than the Constitution.

Roe was bad enough, a joke of a decision made out of whole cloth after Justice Blackmun consulted with phony history and the opinion of his young daughter. But Obergefell is much worse, coming as it does after twenty years of everyday Americans making their views abundantly and overwhelmingly known that they reject faux marriage of the same-sex.

Sitting in their august temple they did what they had wanted to do for some time, and to hell with the democratic process so faithfully adhered to by regular folks. They imposed faux marriage on the whole country with the majority opinion written by Justice Kennedy getting snickers from left, right, and center though not from gay guys who are using some of it in their faux wedding ceremonies.

[Monorprise]

I don’t feel like elected judges would solve our problem, which is in the power to legislate they have usurped not the choices of legislation.

An elected judge would simply legislate in a way that is more consistently popular. The problem we have is that Judges should be deciding individual cases of innocence or guilt only, they should be further more doing so in a way that is consistent across time.

In other-words similar cases must have the same outcome, regardless of whether or not they are separated by 1 year or a 1000 years, and the first outcome is always binding. It is up to legislators to fix it in future cases should that outcome be unsatisfactory.

If we are to restrict them to that power then we must force them to act on each and every single case.
We must furthermore actively impeach them should they issue orders outside of the text of the law. Indeed every order they may issue must be a citation of the law.

Basic implementation of such orders is an executive not judicial power, and as such the implementation of a law as sited by the court should be subject to the consent of the local, state, and Federal executive power.

This is separation of powers and the design of which as to insure that no one man or group of men can hijack the law as our current Federal Employees have done, in reversing law settled for hundreds of years.

[relictele]

I was unclear...I don’t want elected judges. It’s messy enough at local and state level.

Judges without term limits are a de facto violation of separation of powers. Perhaps they could be reappointed but that would require not only another confirmation process but a review of their cases to date. Many might decide to retire lest they be forced to face the music.

[ripley]

I was suggesting that we are now living in a banana republic.

The only thing missing is that all the players wear the military uniforms they have hidden in a closet.

IMHO

[Monorprise]

This is a good idea although it actual works the other way around. The power of the Federal court to end unconstitutional laws is called the power of nullification and it derives from their oath to uphold the Federal Constitution. The same oath every other federal and State official takes.

Under this power as the court itself defined it 200 years ago when first asserting it, the Court can refuses to enforce a law (by a party finding guilty of breaking it) that the court finds unconstitutional. The Federal court cannot repeal the law but just render it null and void. Hence the name nullification.

The court furthermore cannot demand other branches or officials take any particular action on the account of what they say the law is, as that is outside of their power just as it is outside of the case they are deciding. Doing so as has been pointed out countless time would make them supreme not only over the law but all other branches and levels of the Government. Thus obliterating the entire system of checks and balances, along with in time the rest of the Constitution.

Insolently checks and balances and the enforcement of the Federal constitution for which those checks exist requires all parity’s that take the oath retain the power.

What Federal politicians regularly forget and like to freak out about is that the Federal Government isn’t designed to consistently function. Indeed it’s designed so that should an issue become too divisive or questionable in its legality the Government would be unable to act on it at all.

Inaction or as they call it in congress Gridlock is the very lynchpin to the design of our system of Free Constitutional Government.

Any other system including the German system can be hijacked into lawlessness as easily as the dominate power’s will to do so. The German solution is thus really shifting that power to the elected branch rather than abolishing it all together.

In our system which is built around freedom and the now alien to Washington politicians idea that nothing our Government can or should do is so important that it cannot be shut down for years should it lack the consent of the Governed.

Gridlock IS the KEY feature of Free constitutional Government, this is by design because as our founders understood, freedom comes not from Government but our creator.
Government is merely the fire we use to help protect it from others, But like any other fire it is a dangerous tool as capable of harming us as our enemies.