I agree.
The increasingly bizarre —and too convenient— details posted online by the shooters in their so-called “manifestos” suggest that these manifestos may have been uploaded—or revised— by somebody else—someone with a coordinated agenda.
Note that the media and public are tipped to these online ramblings only after the perp is dead or in custody. Then they’re quickly scrubbed.
The handlers are getting so desperate they’re slipping up.
Obama is in front of the cameras before the bodies are cold.
4-chan postings predicted the shooting, but targeted the wrong suspect.
Again, we learn of these postings, and all about the wrong suspect, before the bodies are cold.
Yet days later the FBI is curiously flummoxed in determining the source of these 4-chan posts, or whether there is any connection to the shooting. Gosh darn. If I didn’t know better, I’d wonder if this were intentional misdirection, to give the handlers time to get the evidence planted and the “real” story straight.
Meanwhile, the shooter’s identity is withheld for hours.
Then his identity and online history hit the airwaves simultaneously.
We’re informed the dead perp was an antisocial genius with Asperger’s, whose single mother bought him guns. Gosh darn, he’s an Adam Lanza clone, but wait! He’s a “conservative republican” —even more dangerous!
All those photos of IRA terrorists and jihadis? Ignore !!! Note GUNS!
He’s a conservative republican gun nut!
Then we learn his still living, but curiously unavailable-for-comment mother posted her views online too! She thinks gun laws are lame! She read to her boy when he was a child—from Trump’s The Art of the Deal!
Did she actually say these things?
Truth, hoax, satire, psyops? Who knows anymore?
Has anybody —ANYBODY—been able to determine the ISP addresses from which these postings —or possible later edits and revisions— originated?