Posted on 10/07/2015 9:40:07 PM PDT by Nachum
A federal judge ordered the State Department Wednesday to request former Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton not delete any government business emails she may still have, but said he doubts he can force her to do anything. Judge Reggie B. Walton said since Mrs. Clinton used her own BlackBerry and computer devices, and kept her email server at her home, he doesnt have authority over the records she created on those. The ruling is a significant victory for Mrs. Clinton and the Obama administration, which has argued it has already gone above and beyond its duties under the law in trying
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Permission from whom? Didn’t she run the State Dept?
So does that mean if I shoot someone with another persons gun, I have nothing to worry about? (sarc)
Do these fools know what a search warrant is? Do they know that the items or things the search warrant specifically describe are LEGAL to garner by law enforcement and the courts?
Oh, I forgot........we are not addressing a low level citizen for she is one of the elite of what used to be America.
Oh, forget it!
Federal civilians who want to use their private computers to telework and access unclassified networks have to sign agreements that no classified data can be accessed and the government can seize their private computers at any time. There’s also all kind of antivirus software requirements you have to keep up.
Judge says Hillary Clintons server is private>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep! Private except to the Russians, Chinese, and other enemies of the United States.
Yup.
Clinton co mingled her business at the Clinton Foundation, Secretary of State plus her personal business so she has nothing that is private.
Her Sec Of State business is public, government property and anything she has in her possession at this point is stolen government property.
In fact, her stripping classified Secret documents of their security markings and having them e mailed to personal account is theft of government documents in and of itself.
Theft of Secret documents is espionage
The Clinton Foundation is a tax exempt non profit corporation which makes it's property is quasi -public and thus subject to government review and regulation and is legally subject disclosure
With respect to Clinton's server - nothing is private anymore because it is common knowledge and proven fact that she has so blatantly co mingled Sec of State, Clinton Foundation and her personal business
This Judge is out of his mind
Consider this though because this is the big take away from all of this.
Hillary could not do otherwise if she was using the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton , her position of power and influence as Sec of State, and her business affairs with American and foreign nationals to run massive pay for play scheme.
Pretty much every high level official in the Obama Administration has been caught using secret personal e mails to circumvent scrutiny of their misdeeds and malfeasance.
The smart ones use these accounts selectively and carefully so they don't get caught. All use the government system so they can play It's Personal and Private tin the courts to fight having to turn personal information over.
Hillary made a huge mistake by not even bothering to open up a State Dept e mail account, much less use one and this , combines with doing exactly the same thing with the Clinton Foundation e mails, will be her downfall.
This Mrs Clinton inside, Mr Clinton outside influence peddling game has been going on so long, since the Clinton were still in the White House, that it all seems natural and second nature to them.
Investigators will be able to unravel the tangled web of government, political, Clinton Foundation and private business dealings the Clintons and how the Clintons use their public position's of power as elected or appointed government officials to pursue personal power and wealth for themselves by using her e mail account as the Rosetta Stone and communications nexus for Clinton Corruption Machine
The Black Robes want their payoffs to continue,
and to HELL with the US Constitution.
This judge must be an affirmative-action hire...and have severe judgment issues.
FLASHBACK:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/14/libby.hearing/index.html?iref=newssearch
Judge orders Libby jailed during appeal
June 14, 2007
WASHINGTON (CNN) — A federal judge on Thursday ordered I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby to report to prison while his attorneys appeal his perjury and obstruction convictions.
Libby’s attorneys asked that the order be stayed, but U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton denied the request and told Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff that he has 10 days to appeal the ruling.
Libby was sentenced to 2½ years in prison for lying and obstructing the investigation into who revealed Valerie Plame Wilson as a CIA operative in 2003. He also was fined $250,000.
(snip)
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/justices-black-panther-lies/
Justices Black Panther Lies
AUGUST 03, 2012
Court Rules DOJ Politicized Black Panther Case, Awards JW Court Fees
Judicial Watch has been confident for some time that the evidence shows that political appointees at the Holder Justice Department were involved in the decision to abandon the DOJs own voter intimidation lawsuit against the New Black Panther Party. And weve also been concerned that at least one high ranking Justice Department official lied about it under oath.
And in a major victory for Judicial Watch, a federal court seems to agree with our analysis of this continuing scandal.
The ruling came courtesy of Judge Reggie B. Walton of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in response to Judicial Watchs effort to obtain attorneys fees from the Justice Department for stonewalling the release of documents pertaining to the Black Panther scandal. Heres the key quote from Judge Waltons ruling:
The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJs dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perezs testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.
(snip)
Anti-gun judge in Tea Party vs. IRS suit shows moderate dangers to liberty
News & Politics Examiner (USA) - October 29, 2014
The federal judge who dismissed lawsuits by Tea Party groups against the Internal Revenue Service was nominated by President George W. Bush. The media is making sure everyone knows that.
Judge Reggie Walton was a Republican-appointed federal judge, Politico tells us. Walton [was] a President George W. Bush-appointee.
Walton was nominated as a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, by President George W. Bush in 2001, USA Today chimed in. That background was also noted in stories appearing in conservative sites, creating the impression that, even if the decision may be unpopular in some circles, at least it reflects a spirit of bipartisanship, and what we can do when we put aside oue differences and work together.
What it actually reflects is the destructive effect of Stupid Party compromises, the kinder, gentler and compassionate conservatism thats been at the squishy RINO core of the Bush family political dynasty, beginning with old man. And this isn’t the first time Walton has shown the stuff hes made of.
The guy has proven time and again, oath to the Constitution be damned, his true allegiance is to unrestrained government. As presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, BuzzFeed noted, Walton dramatically expanded the ability of the federal government to use controversial techniques to gather intelligence on Americans both at home and abroad that have outraged civil libertarians.
Walton was appointed to that position by Chief Justice John Roberts (the guy who betrayed his backers on Obamacare).
In more than a dozen classified rulings, the nations surveillance court has created a secret body of law, The New York Times reported. [I]t has quietly become almost a parallel Supreme Court...
Walton, naturally, is also an avowed judicial opponent of the right of the people to keep and bear arms. A Gomer link seems in order here.
U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton last night dismissed a National Rifle Association (NRA)-backed lawsuit challenging the constitutionality on Second Amendment grounds of Washington, DC’s ban on the sale and possession of handguns, the Violence Policy Center crowed back in 2004, before the historic Heller decision. Judge Walton’s 68-page ruling in Seegars v. Ashcroft upholds the ban, which was adopted by the City Council in 1976.
In his opinion, Judge Walton wrote: [T]he Court must conclude that the Second Amendment does not confer an individual right to possess firearms. Rather, the Amendment’s objective is to ensure the vitality of state militias,” the VPC release continued.
With that as backstory, Walton providing cover for IRS should come as no surprise. Nor should what can be expected if moderate establishment Republicans continue to treat principled conservatives as enemies that must be crushed, all the while forging power-sharing alliances with progressives from places that embrace the Evil Party, and dont require masks.
(snip)
Reggie? Let me guess.
Mine isn’t private but then some are more equal than others.
He doesnt have authority over the records she created on those?
He does because she conducted State Dept. business on it. Also there is the criminal goings-on that she participated/instigated from it WITH ties to the Clinton Foundation. This bitch belongs under the prison.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.