Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76
The way I understand it, Trump wanted to build something someplace and attempted to obtain the land in question. The landowner refused the offer so Trump availed himself of the court system. Maybe he succeeded, maybe he didn't. I don't profess to know how the situation turned out.

There's no excuse for a Freeper to be ignorant in 2015. You could have tried Google:

TRUMPED: The Donald, The Widow and Eminent Domain

Sneak preview, the property owner won. And yes, I CAN fault a businessman for taking "all legal avenues" when those avenues are unjust and wrong.

258 posted on 10/07/2015 1:01:56 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: GunRunner
Point is, I didn't care to know. And the fact that Trump did not prevail in that particular case is fine. He went through the proper process. When you are a land developer, you are not going to win every time. You will get turned down a lot by zoning boards, courts, etc.

I think Trump wanted to build the tallest building in the world on the West Side but was turned down. So...he built a bunch of buildings that were shorter. So it goes.

260 posted on 10/07/2015 1:09:09 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (A businessman gets things done with own money. A politician takes money and gets nothing done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson