Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCarthy: ‘Never My Intention’ to Link Benghazi Committee to Politics
Roll Call ^ | 10/2/15 | Emma Dumain

Posted on 10/02/2015 7:29:46 AM PDT by markomalley

The likely next speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, returned to Fox News Thursday night in a bid to clarify his remarks 48 hours earlier on the Benghazi committee.

“It was never my intention to say that,” the California Republican told news anchor Bret Baier.

He was referencing Tuesday night’s comments to Sean Hannity in which he credited the special committee to investigate the 2012 Benghazi attacks with sinking 2016 Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton’s poll numbers, and cited that as an example of the kind of conservative leadership he would provide as speaker.

The remarks prompted a call for an apology from a fellow Republican, a walk-back from Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, bipartisan flak, and a rebuke from Clinton’s campaign, which was happy to have ammunition to discredit the committee ahead of Clinton’s Oct. 22 testimony.

McCarthy, the current House majority leader, explained:

“This committee was set up for one sole purpose: To find the truth on behalf of the families for four dead Americans. Now, I did not intend to imply in any way that that work is political, of course it is not. Look at the way they have carried themselves out.

“The point I was trying to make, and I want to be very clear about this: I wasn’t saying the committee was political. That committee is solely to get the truth out, but it happened within the truth you found out about a server. This committee’s sole purpose is to find the truth why four Americans were killed that night, and that is the work they have done, that is the hearings they have done, they have been applauded on all sides of the aisle, so it was never my intention to say that.”

Baier asked whether McCarthy had spoken directly to his colleagues in the days since his comments created a firestorm — Democrats reveled in what they called an acknowledgement of the committee’s political motivations, and some Republicans admitted they were concerned their future speaker might not be ready for prime time.

“I’ve talked to Trey,” said McCarthy of Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., the chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi. “I’ve talked to the colleagues. I’ve expressed to them exactly what I’m telling you right now … it was never my intention. This committee has nothing to do with politics. Think for one moment: Look at the work that Trey has done, no one questions Trey’s integrity. It was never my intention to imply that this committee was political because we all know it is not. And it has one sole purpose: Let’s find the truth wherever the truth takes us.”

McCarthy said, “I told [Gowdy] I regret that this ever has taken place, it was never my intention, and Trey goes, ‘I know it’s not your intention because you know it’s not political,'” adding that Gowdy assured McCarthy the remarks would not undermine the scheduled committee hearing later this month in which Clinton will testify.

When questioned why it took him until now to speak publicly on the matter, McCarthy conceded, “I should have come out right afterwards … you can always improve.”


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 114th; benghazi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Goes to show that we have the evil party and the stupid party...does it really matter?
1 posted on 10/02/2015 7:29:46 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Not ready for prime time


2 posted on 10/02/2015 7:31:46 AM PDT by hoosiermama (If Obama canÂ’t convince Americans heÂ’s not a moslem then it certainly isnÂ’t TrumpÂ’s job to do s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This jerk is a real lightweight!


3 posted on 10/02/2015 7:31:52 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Thank goodness he exposed himself now for the doofis that he seems to be.

Can we seem candidate #s 2, 3, and 4 before we commit?

4 posted on 10/02/2015 7:32:02 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This should kill his House Speakership, but it won’t.


5 posted on 10/02/2015 7:33:03 AM PDT by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

He made it worse last night. Very inept.

Not someone we want for Speaker.


6 posted on 10/02/2015 7:33:32 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This blatantly clueless mind set, coupled with charges of adultery, hardly makes for an impressive resume for Boehner’s replacement.


7 posted on 10/02/2015 7:34:18 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
McCarthy you idiot! You walked right into the left hook. You are a dufus!
8 posted on 10/02/2015 7:35:09 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

We just got rid of Boehner, why would we want this asshat in there?

Are they all like this, this is what we get to choose from?


9 posted on 10/02/2015 7:35:16 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 (I have such happy days, and hope you do to!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It’s difficult to make out what the idiot is really saying when he has both feet in his mouth.


10 posted on 10/02/2015 7:36:02 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Proverbs 21:20 - The wise have stores of food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Terrible response!!! Not speaker material!!!


11 posted on 10/02/2015 7:37:19 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX ( My only objective is to defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Terrible response!!! Not speaker material!!!


12 posted on 10/02/2015 7:37:22 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX ( My only objective is to defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Wouldn’t doubt if it wasn’t a uniparty strategy to put some wind in Hillary’s sails.


13 posted on 10/02/2015 7:39:39 AM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

ugh its boehner 2.0


14 posted on 10/02/2015 7:39:43 AM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

But you did. Now sit down and shut up. Don’t even think about the Speakership, idiot.


15 posted on 10/02/2015 7:40:08 AM PDT by Afterguard (Liberals will let you do anything you want, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
As has been said Kevin is a few pennies short of a dime!

Like many male models, looks good but don't let him open his mouth lest he catch flies!

16 posted on 10/02/2015 7:40:27 AM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Too late, you stepped in it, Bud.

And Media Matters/MoveOn.org are going to make hay out of it every day from now until the election.

Truly stunning incompetence.
If Hannity cracked you like this what are the Lib attack dogs gonna do to you?


17 posted on 10/02/2015 7:41:36 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Allen West for Speaker.


18 posted on 10/02/2015 7:42:03 AM PDT by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What has been said…cannot be unsaid.


19 posted on 10/02/2015 7:42:15 AM PDT by spokeshave (When you follow the Obama doctrine and “lead from behind”, you eat other people’s dust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Idiot.


20 posted on 10/02/2015 7:43:17 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson