It is a curious situation. Her hubby says he does not agree with her on at least some issues but encourages her to continue where she wants to go.
To me it sounds much like James Carville and Mary Matalin. In my estimation those two are the consummate political whores laughing all the way to the bank. Both are employed by the establishment and that says it all for me that both are untrustworthy in any of their public opinions.
As for CW and her hubby, I’m sure that a talented hacker could find out who they really are, but is it worth the effort when she does all the work for us to expose herself as a RINO?
so you still think the issue is CW and who she works for. Sorry, to me that’s not the issue.
Facts are facts. Truth is truth. Even when those facts and that truth come from a source one may not trust. Here’s a suggestion: judge an idea on the merits of the idea, not the merits of the source. I’m not saying don’t pay any attention to the source, but stop ignoring the ideas 100%.