Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dforest
A one term Senator with no executive experience is not going to win the general election.

LOL, haven't been paying attention to recent history much, have you?

Obama's election proves that a Senator with a well-defined ideology once elected President can have enormous success at moving the country in the direction he wants to. It's time to let Cruz do for conservatives what Obama has done for liberals.

We have never elected a President who had neither won an election nor served in the military or in government before. So the odds on Trump winning continue to be very long.

131 posted on 09/26/2015 2:34:26 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

Somehow I knew someone would bring up Obama.
Thanks for playing!


135 posted on 09/26/2015 2:38:36 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones

Well then, if rebel Trump wins the nomination we’ll have a great opportunity to make history and possibly alter the current hellbent trajectory of our nation.

We must all hang together or assuredly we’ll all hang separately.


145 posted on 09/26/2015 2:45:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones
Obama's election proves that a Senator with a well-defined ideology once elected President can have enormous success at moving the country in the direction he wants to.

Obama was the antibush, foisted upon the unsuspecting and gullible public by the leftist media.

"Senator with a well defined ideology", except his ideology was anything but well defined, until after he got into office.

What got him elected was the relentless push by 100% of the media, everywhere one turned, as the new savior of the human race.

And even at that, how many million did not believe it?

On our side, what did we have to vote for? A dirt bag back stabber with no inclination to win,with a nice choice as veep. Then on the second try, a backstabbing forked tongue that had a hard time drawing interest beyond the extremely "faithful", the robots.

The left could care less if their nominee is an avowed (publically) socialist, a harpie whose credentials are that she is the wife of an impeached lying sob, or a lying sack self admitted born foreign, that then changed for convenience and carried, yes carried, by the socialist one worlders on the left.

We once again have the choice of supporting one of over 10 candidates.

Who stands out that will fight the good fight, take it to them, and not be steamrollered by the universally leftist controllers known as the media?

175 posted on 09/26/2015 5:58:45 PM PDT by going hot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones

Obama - 95% black votes + promised uniting country resulting in millions of white liberal’s guilt votes .

Obama - $2500 savings in healthcare premiums + subsidized Obamacare for all + keep yor doctor + keep you current insurance plan .... all were lies but did not know that in 2008

Obama - running on Bush fatigue + Iraq war fatigue

Obama - running against old, pudgy, short opponent with bad teeth and reputation of a maverick

No senators running in 2016 have those unique advantages.


186 posted on 09/26/2015 6:35:17 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors! Trump has no rich donors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson