Posted on 09/24/2015 9:17:00 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
Politico reports that First Lady Michelle Obama, looking lovely and classy, greeted Pope Francis Tuesday while wearing a $2,290 dress. While the Obamas are not Catholics, this is still a finger-in-the-eye to a White House guest who frequently speaks out to wild Democrat applause about the evils of excessive capitalism.
Both President and Mrs. Obama are disciples of Jeremiah Wright, a racist Jew-hating Chicago-based preacher. Not long after Obama ascended to the presidency, Wright, Obamas religious mentor for 20 years, retired to a $1 million, 10,400 square foot mansion located next to a country club and golf course.
According to WorldVision, you can feed a child for just $35 a month. Michelle Obamas dress would feed over 80 children for that month. This choice obviously is contrary to the values of Pope Francis. But the Obamas religious values come from elsewhere, a divisive and disturbing place, not a charitable or unifying one.
Other than this quick Politico blurb that doesnt even take issue with the cost of Mrs. Obamas dress, nowhere else has this news been reported. Compare this to the medias 2012 media firestorm over Ann Romneys $990 dress, which she wore on a morning show, not to stand in the shadow of St. Peter.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Well, she does have a lot of class.
Agreed.
'Ghetto' is also a class.
I also didn’t think, for a First Lady, that it was unreasonably expensive, nor that she needed to wear a cheap dress to meet the Pope.
Palm Desert, ha, I spent my childhood going there to see my grandparents.
Very
The hustle for a bustle. Is that why the White House just paid $400,000. for a tonnage shipment of Whalebone from Japan?/
Speaking of fashion....
What ever happened to misterghost?
I'm surprised, because usually they wear skirts and dresses short enough to see their butts.
Is that the $2300 dress? It is NOTHING special, the tailoring/lines are garbage, and it in NO way flatters Mooshelle’s unfortunate shape. Also, it’s far too young a style for her.
THAT thing is a $2300.00 dress??????
God it’s ugly!
“Michelle Obama is a striking woman.”
does that mean she is a woman to be struck ?
The dress was not appropriate for the season, and it was not
a good fit. Never mind the cost, First Ladies always dress nicely and money is not the issue.
She should have worn a color fitting for the season and with more class. It really gave her a stuffed in look, especially the behind.
The color would have been great for July, but not late September.
It looks like some polyester job you’d buy off the sale rack at Kmart. She has terrible taste.
Hey, I bet the Pope’s dress coast more than $2300!
She can wear a $23,000 dress, but every morning when she wakes up, she is still an angry black lady with a grotesquely huge ass.
Is it just me but does it looks like the Wookie has a mini version of her Boob Belt.
Might Moochelle have been wearing a bustle?”
Whomever took the side view pic that appeared on Drudge should probably look for another occupation. She had quite a shelf protruding. No wonder we only see frontal shots.
Her dress reminded me of a design I used to whip up for myself years ago. Took a couple of hours and $3 or so for material from the remnant table.
Hair is not brushed and her hem is uneven. Looks like the Wookie just pulled that dress out from a garbage bin.
My mom wears 6 thousand dollar outfits to go out to dinner in Palm Desert at Ruth’s Chris.”
Why?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.