Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12; C. Edmund Wright; Servant of the Cross
"The point of debate is....should Americans unite behind a newly elected president, or begin the divide immediately. Even a socialist community organizer deserves benefit of doubt that he will evolve and do what would be best for all Americans."

There is no debate. If the president is a destructive leftwinger, as we knew was the case with Obama, the divide is there from the beginning; no need to "begin" it. We have nothing in common with the left. There's no point in playing nice, and in fact, it's a dangerous weakness.

Your socialist community organizer made his true nature known early on, so tell me why you think he deserved the benefit of the doubt that he would "evolve."

If you're that naive, you shouldn't be voting.

But that isn't precisely the case here. Your gymnastics are based not on naivete, but on your need to try and find a way to excuse liberal Donald Trump. AGAIN.

"For example if Ted Cruz gets elected president in 2016, would Hillary be wise to wish him success on the first day in office or immediately start calling him a right wing extremist?"

You surely don't think Clinton would wish Cruz well, and you must, by now, understand the blackly evil nature of the left.

You're just struggling to create some justification for Trump.

"If Trump had continued to praise Obama after first term, then Trump should be disparaged, justifiably. But to regurgitate a statement made by Trump 8 years ago, on first day of office of the newly elected president, and disparage Trump for it is unpatriotic, unfair and smacks of desperation by supporters of some other candidate who is failing to resonate with voters."

Trump can be justifiably disparaged for a lot of things, considering his history of liberalism...and the liberalism that he frequently reveals even now.

Sorry, entropy, but I'm not buying the excuses. This is all part of vetting a candidate, no matter how much you dislike it.

275 posted on 09/24/2015 3:40:24 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ("A real conservative will bear the scars...will have been in the trenches fighting."--- Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]


To: CatherineofAragon; entropy12; Servant of the Cross
There is no debate. If the president is a destructive leftwinger, as we knew was the case with Obama, the divide is there from the beginning; no need to "begin" it. We have nothing in common with the left. There's no point in playing nice, and in fact, it's a dangerous weakness.

Your socialist community organizer made his true nature known early on, so tell me why you think he deserved the benefit of the doubt that he would "evolve." If you're that naive, you shouldn't be voting.

But that isn't precisely the case here. Your gymnastics are based not on naivete, but on your need to try and find a way to excuse liberal Donald Trump. AGAIN.

Every word 100% correct, and I too don't buy entropy is that naive and foolish, nor do I even buy he thinks a man that naive and foolish just 5 years ago should be President. But the mental gymnastics are part of the cult adherence.

276 posted on 09/24/2015 5:02:53 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson