Posted on 09/23/2015 5:29:00 AM PDT by demshateGod
I love you too, sweetie. Bye.
“Sorry bobbi”
Thanks for letting us know that you’re one of the GOP Insider types here, as they are the ONLY ONES that engage in personal attacks on Trump supporters. Others, including Cruz supporters, are like Cruz himself and RESPECT Trump supporters.
“...that’s not how it works. You see, the burden of proof is on you”
Trump is holding 30% in the polling, so actually the burden of proof is on you Republican insiders to convince us “crazies” to move away from him. In 240 or so posts just on this thread, I see NO EVIDENCE that you’ve moved a single person - so YOU HAVE FAILED in your quest to prop up Bush (or Rubio).
But you’re welcome to keep trying, it’s fun to watch!
You embarrass yourself....I've published an Amazon best selling anti GOP insider book. How bout you?
“You embarrass yourself....I’ve published an Amazon best selling anti GOP insider book. How bout you?”
LOL...haven’t we all. Well, I’m Reagan’s grandson, TRY TO TOP THAT.
This article is so inane. Of course in 2009 Barack was an unknown nationally. He got elected by saying all the right things (which only later turned out to be lies, but not a single person of prominence accused Barack of lying in 2009).
Barack said “It is not red America or blue America, it is one America” ) paraphrasing. So he was the first black president who was heralded as the great UNITER by all.
Anyone who disparages elected president on the first day of his office is neither smart nor fair nor patriotic.
Trump is smart, fair and patriotic. He was hoping Barack would be the great uniter. So he said the right things about the new president.
The main point here is, by 2012, Trump had realized Barack was an empty suit and said so.
So it would not be possible that what you discribe, about the election of Obama, could ever happen again.
For the record, I for one said from the moment that Barak Hussein Obama walked on the national scene that he was diaster, a train wreck. His first day, as a sworn president, he excutive ordered 45 million dollars to bring “refugees” from the Gaza strip to America. <p On that day I said the man is going to try to destroy the United States. I stand by that statement.
Trump is a “big government progressive” no matter the party he belongs to. Let us examine his border fence idea. At what cost does this occur? Who controls it? Who maintains it. None of this happens for free. Is there an alternative? I believe, yes there is a very cost effective alternative. Enforce the laws. It is just that simple. But that would an politicians would have to do their job. As would law enforcement.
I'm saying Trump is a businessman. Successful Businesses always change to survive - they add products, discontinue products, acquire new businesses, divest underperforming units. Blackberry was the market leader but didn't change - look what happened to them. 0bama doesn't change - look what happened to our country.
The largest selling business book ever is Trump's "The art of the deal" So Trump's core business value hasn't changed - make a profit and be successful. I believe Trump is a patriot at heart. He has all the money he needs and now wants to apply those same business principles to the Government. I heard a clip of Trump talking to Oprah over 20 years ago - he sounded the same. Things are broken and need to be fixed.
I still want Cruz and hope Trump picks him as VP.
Barbra Streisand! Read the list of departments Trump wants to abolish, and get hold of facts, before spouting “he is a big government progressive”. It makes you look un-informed.
Are you sure you know anything? There is multi-Billion dollar drug trade coming from Mexico border every year. Enforce the laws? Do you understand criminals do not obey laws? Without a substantial wall, the mules (drug carriers) just walk across the border. We can’t have border guard every 100 feet across a 2000 mile long border.
Why is the Israel’s wall working so great? Why did the Chinese build a wall 7 times longer than Mexican border?
Cost of the wall? Obviously you do not believe Mexico will pay for it, otherwise Mexico loses $45 Billion trade surplus with US EVERY YEAR, and the wall will cost $5 Billion ONE TIME. Like Trump says, professional politicians are clueless how to make good deals. They never had to make deals, just be good at giving smooth sounding speeches.
Enforce the laws? Did Trump ever say he won’t enforce the laws? Trump will enforce the laws 1000% better than the current pResident.
It is amazing how people are so ill-informed.
You are unpatriotic and unfair if you criticize any president on the first day in office. A president is for ALL Americans, not just democrats or republicans. We always hope he will succeed in improving life in America.
Trump did exactly the patriotic and fair minded thing in encouraging the new president. Unless you are a rabid partisan, all patriotic and fair minded citizens should follow that route. There will be plenty of time during the next 4 years to point out failures of the president.
Another termite in the wood pile has spoken.
I spent 35 years in Chicagoland. I once helped distributing democratic pamphlets to voters in Chicago. I also knew Obama was a fraud from day one. I know Chicago politicians better than most.
However I am also patriotic and fair minded. People like me hope the new president will prove beneficial. Obama was saying all the right things. I do not blame Trump or anyone else for hoping Obama will be a good uniter and all.
Biggest and most absurd and bot like stretch of all PING on excusing Trump's fawning over Obama in 2009: WOW the depths are astonishing.
You could not be more wrong. When you hope a clearly anti American pro Marxist president succeeds, it is YOU who are unpatriotic. There is nothing patriotic or defensible about fawning over Obama at any time for any reason and under any circumstances. President Obama never thought for a second he was the President of Republicans and conservatives, not a damned second. WTF should we assume he was?
New boss, same as the old boss.
You are a bit late. You should have spent money telling that to Americans BEFORE they voted for Obama TWICE. Either you have not enough money to spread your words or American voters were ill-informed. Which is it?
If one has not enough money to spread their words, basically one is ineffectual, a sideline show, and irrelevant.
So by your logic, Fiorina should also be disqualified?
I had sort of hoped he would build on the Clinton (Bill) model of governance which wasn't nearly as destructive. It's also true that as bad as I feared it could get in early 2009, I would not have predicted he would be quite as destructive and nearly as horrendous as he became.
By the time 2010 arrived, I knew better to think that way any more.
And your comment makes 252.
I was there in 2002 on Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.