But Hamilton still was not ruling out the idea of "local interest" amendments? He was just suggesting that it would be harder to get support from three-fourths of the states?
-PJ
104 posted on 09/29/2015 12:59:38 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
It wasn’t supposed to be too difficult to convene the states. Two thirds is high but not too high when there is general agreement the government needs fixing.
105 posted on 09/29/2015 1:34:26 PM PDT by Jacquerie
( To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)