Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too; betty boop
<>I just want to know where the requirement to agree on the amendments beforehand originated.<>

Beats me. I've been asking the same question at FR for some time.

From Betty Boop’s link in #89, a few dozen states submitted general applications for a convention to propose amendments.

The lawyers at FR and CoS would have us believe they don't “count.”

100 posted on 09/28/2015 4:04:18 PM PDT by Jacquerie ( To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie

It’s not the lawyers that are holding things up, it’s the state legislatures.

If 34 of those legislatures pressed forward together, they could press Congress to call a Convention but they’re not doing that because they have 37 states who would rather work with the COS Project rules.

Congress won’t call it because the applications have streamed in so slowly on so many subjects expiring or never renewed that they are not compelled and more importantly the states today do not want a COS without rules and restrictions


102 posted on 09/28/2015 5:51:43 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson