[IrishBrigade]

Read the rest of my posts in this thread on the topic.

Fair enough...and I have done so...I don’t disagree with you, I simply think that a pedophile’s first reaction, upon reading this article and the ensuing commentary, would be ‘ah, legitimacy at last’...

which I realize you are not actually saying...

[IrishBrigade]

I simply think that a pedophile’s first reaction, upon reading this article and the ensuing commentary, would be ‘ah, legitimacy at last’...

IrishBrigade meant to write ‘I simply don’t think...’, which ironically, it appears he didn’t do...

[mkjessup]

Read the rest of my posts in this thread on the topic.
Fair enough...and I have done so...I don’t disagree with you, I simply think that a pedophile’s first reaction, upon reading this article and the ensuing commentary, would be ‘ah, legitimacy at last’...
which I realize you are not actually saying...

No, not at all. At the risk of employing a flawed analogy (perhaps not), consider how there used to be news-stands in most major cities and large towns, and in some of them there were semi-discreet 'adult areas' where pornography could be viewed and purchased. That garbage wasn't displayed in the front window of the news-stands, easily seen by passerbys or children, I suppose what I am suggesting is that if these articles are to be posted on FR in the interest of 'knowing our enemy', they should perhaps be categorized in such a way that they are not flaunted in front of our general readership (which may in fact include underaged minors).

I am seeking an effective way of making everyone aware of this insidious threat to our children, to our morals, without unintentionally providing any sort of justification or (God forbid) encouragement for the twisted perverts who advocate such behavior.