Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanVictory

I don’t think the “right to privacy” exists in the Constitution (incidentally, initially found to exist by Ike’s Earl Warren- Griswald v. Ct- contraception).

If that’s your question.


335 posted on 09/20/2015 5:02:29 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]


To: VinL

Correct, it does not exist in the Constitution. It was a fabrication to suit what was perceived, erroneously, as a rising political trend conceived in the Wilsonian sense as a constitutional “evolution.” Since then, the increasing tide of people seeing such clear pictures of children in the womb has wrought an increasing awareness that what abortion actually is is murder of a person, albeit one in the womb. In the meantime states have increasingly recognized that inflicting death upon a child in the womb is murder and, except for the murder of federal officers or in interference with witnesses in federal legal proceedings in the like, homicide if for the states to define and punish, not the federal government. One day Roe v. Wade will be seen as another Dred Scott decision.


346 posted on 09/20/2015 5:21:17 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson