Posted on 09/19/2015 8:51:40 AM PDT by Kaslin
We can live with these people in a harmonious united nation.
No need to worry about conflict.
Is there a list of all 187 who voted that way?
187 just selling their souls.
They’re cashing in on a one way ticket to hell.
Follow the political donation $$$. Thats how 187 cretins of greed sell their souls.
Homicide is too general a term, murder is more accurate.
I’ll bet many of these same 187 would vote to ban the sale of veal or foie gras. Fresh baby parts; not a problem.
These 187 House members should be indicted, tried, convicted, sentenced and publicly hanged in a Nuremberg-style trial for their complicity in genocide of persons in the womb, crimes against humanity, and treason.
The key votes were decades ago in the SCOTUS decision on abortion.
The key votes were in the early 90s when congress authorized the use of fetal tissue in research.
The GOP is not really trying to change anything. They just want to throw this up because they think it will help in election 2016.
The same thing with the Iran nuclear agreement, its for the 2016 election.
As Rush Limbaugh has often said, “words mean things.” Let’s stop calling these people “pro choice”, and start referring to them by the more accurate term “anti-life.”
You are correct. They are anti life. Pro choice can mean to chose life not death
Thanks for the list.
Dan Lipinski is reliably pro-life despite being a Chicago Democrat - he voted “for”, although I suspect he’s won’t be able to buck the city Machine for much longer.
Bob Dold (R) voted against - he’s suburban Chicago with Mark-Kirk-like views, who thinks his only route to reelection is to avoid rattling the libs on social issues. Yuck.
Ever since the leftist, liberal Democrat Party pushed legal abortion through the Supreme Court in 1973, I’ve wondered what the reasoning behind murdering American children could possibly be. I knew it was an attempt to capture the vote of American women, but what kind of woman were they after?
Was it the women who were planning to get an abortion if they were to accidentally become pregnant, or was there something else involved here? I’ve been observing these Democrat voting women now for over forty years, and I think I’ve finally identified who they are. They’re not the women who plan to get an abortion if the occasion arises, they’re the women who have already received an abortion.
As planned by Democrat strategists, once a woman has received an abortion, she knows in her heart that she’s committed a mortal sin and is desperate for anyone in authority to tell her she’s OK, and there’s no sin in killing her child. Once a woman has murdered her child, she is hooked forever and will continue to vote for those Democrats for as long as she lives simply because of their reassurance that she’s done nothing wrong.
As there have been an estimated thirty million abortions performed in this country since 1973, the Democrat Party can depend on at least thirty million American women’s vote in every election.
It's not an "election issue". Those who against this bill are Satanic not legislators, they're a Satanic Death Cult.
The Lipinski’s, Like father,(Bill) like son. Both conservatives as is his district. Proud to know the old man even though I ran against him .
You need to ask the court that question.
Did the court EVER say a child born alive didn’t have protection? I don’t think so. If there is any ambiguity, it’s about time a law has passed. Let those who voted against it defend their support of the slaughter of just-born infants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.