And call me a class warfare advocate if you want, but why doesn't she pay off her 2010 campaign staff already? She's worth tens of millions and owns 2 yachts.
Also, didn't she sympathize with Muslims right after 9/11?
Is the bandwagon serving free beer?
She also says removing illegals is impossible.
Now that her track record has now become known. Hell no.
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO AND HELL NO.
No. Next question.
Fiorina is just the latest “stop Trump” candidate, but she’s just as Affirmative Action as Carson. Notice how Carson is no longer the main topic of conversation, that just proves my point about Fiorina.
Not even if hell freezes over.
She has been radically pro-abortion, and before she recently claimed we should defund PP she stated we should not because they do a lot of good things. This election cycle. Just because she’s learned to listen to the people doesn’t mean she holds those convictions. I’d sooner trust Trump on his changes of position than her.
You can see that she takes a deep breath and speaks forcefully, but it seemed to me that she was not cut off like Cruz and Walker.
Bump
I would never vote for her....she’s a RINO who plays the “woman” card the same way liberal blacks place the race card.
Funny, earlier in the week it was “Carson is gaining on Trump!” Now, he’s forgotten and Carly is the flavor of the week.
In a week or two, it will be someone else being propped up by the media.
Yawn.
GOPe & media sez: “Yes, of course you should!”
Why else would they have spent the entire debate slobbering so adoringly over Old Hatchetface?
One hundred percent chance that most conservative Fiorina supporters will not believe they could have supported her by actual election time.
No. Not jumping on Carly Fiorina’s bandwagon.
No. Carly is owned by the establishment political elite.
Too slick, too practiced, as if she had the questions in advance.
I’ll give her serious consideration for VP or a cabinet post. We need somebody with the skills to kick congressional butt. Running a company and dealing with the senate and house are two completely different animals. In the former, everyone is your subordinate and must obey. In the latter, you are herding cats who have to have a good reason to go along.
FDR, JFK and RWR knew that congress reacts to public pressure and they used the bully pulpit to get things done. The next President will need good public speaking and persuasion skills and the ability to use them in the media. So far, none of the candidates whose policies I like have demonstrated those skills.
Christie and Huckster are good motivators but way too liberal. Trump is a little too combative. Fiorina is dour. Ted Cruz most closely matches my politics, but lacks likability. Rubio, Paul, Santorum and Walker look and sound like kids in an adult world. Jeb is dull. Carson is too unemotional. Kasich, Gilmore, Jindal and Pataki... Who cares?
I think Cruz and possibly Rubio or Walker can get some coaching and gain the necessary skills to be successful presidents, but so far, the fall far short of Renaldus Magnus. I just can’t see any way Trump or Fiorina will make good, persuasive presidents.
As far as the general election, Dems and a lot of Independents, per blog comments, HATE Carly. She has no chance of being elected president and the GOP knows that. She is a useful tool, and nothing more. She can do a lot of damage though. People need to be careful because with Carly's help, we could end up with Jeb.
After her powerful performance, I’m already there.
Hugely impressed with her poise, intellect, and her direct answers.
She acted Presidential.
Carly did not belong on that stage by the original rules of the debate. She has a “rules do not apply to me” view on life and it showed in the debate