We are not voting on their performance in the business world.
We are voting on their maturity, their grasp of the issues, and their ability to stay calm under fire.
Whose finger do you want on the nuclear button?
That is a silly question anyway. I don’t think any of them would be dumb enough to use that button flippantly.
Whose finger do you want on the nuclear button?
................................................
MINE
I'm in favor of a jock-humored bully with a bad hairstyle and 50 years of business experience risking his entire fortune and family on a regular basis, something no one else on that panel has ever done.
Considering our enemies today? I will go for the guy that they believe won't be afraid to use it versus someone they are sure will hesitate. It's only a deterrent if your your enemy is afraid you will make use of it, otherwise it's just expensive window dressing.
We are voting on their maturity, their grasp of the issues, and their ability to stay calm under fire.
Whose finger do you want on the nuclear button?
Business experience is very relevant - running the Executive Branch is not a whole lot different than running a large organization. The leader sets broad policies, then has lower level managers (whom he/she picks) implement them well. Someone who can't do that well isn't going to be a good President, regardless of their maturity.
Regarding calm under fire and fingers on the nuclear button: You sound like those criticizing Reagan. Look, Donald Trump has spent his whole life BUILDING things - as in, being creative. The exact opposite of that is nuclear destruction, where you not only destroy people and things, but you can't then go in and use the same land because it is poisoned. He'll be tough, and he'll use his demeanor to intimidate foreign leaders where necessary - it is part of a strategy; this is a guy who thinks in terms of success over decades, not just the next news cycle.