[snip] Scott Walker: The idea behind your campaign seemed to be that you’re a normal guy who would return us to normalcy, but we conservatives don’t want normalcy anymore. We want vengeance. Will you commit to ruthlessly annihilating liberalism wherever you find it? More specifically, will you commit to destroying all federal government employee unions? [/snip]And Walker just did -- the writer is just a Scottbot.
I don’t see where he throws anyone a softball. However, since Scott has stated he would, perhaps that is the softball question. Which came first though, his question, or Scott’s pledge? Since today is the first time I have heard about his pledge, I’m thinking he formulated the question before.
[snip] Scott Walker: The idea behind your campaign seemed to be that you’re a normal guy who would return us to normalcy, but we conservatives don’t want normalcy anymore. We want vengeance. Will you commit to ruthlessly annihilating liberalism wherever you find it? More specifically, will you commit to destroying all federal government employee unions? [/snip]
And Walker just did — the writer is just a Scottbot.
Not to mention the fact that although state public employee unions are high on the list of every state’s fiscal problems, federal employees unions are not up there in terms of causes of federal over-spending. That distinction lies with the politicians themselves.
Which means that Walker’s big issue isn’t so big an issue on the national stage... which might be one of the reason why his candidacy is sinking fast.
Why should I vote for you and re-fight the gay marriage battle that we’ve already decisively lost
Thus I take a lot of what he has said as jokes. If they are not jokes then I question his lawyer abilities. Because the Supreme Court ignored the Constitution when deciding the same-sex marriage question. Which leaves us in a Constitutional quandary. who decides when the Supreme Court makes an unconstitutional ruling? Who knocks down an illegal law by the Supreme Court when their functions do not include law creation?
He could be for Rand Paul