or this?
Or this?
Should I go on, or could you maybe have Googled on your own to find exactly the dimension/shape of lights that you think might be showing in his glasses?
Posted on 09/10/2015 2:18:46 PM PDT by Sontagged
@jaketapper Bush looks to be using a teleprompter (reflecting off his glasses) in your interview. Right beside camera lens. - @TheLastRefuge2
< img src="https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/statuses/642070191870976000">
Those are not teleprompters.
*******************************************
Very possibly not. But if the reflections are of lights (suggested by your posting of a video/camera light) they are square lights which your posted light is not. So, maybe you should actually post a picture of SQUARE television/video lights to buttress your argument. Square ones may well exist for all I know.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/10/politics/jeb-bush-donald-trump-carly-fiorina/index.html
Check out the different reflection in Jeb’s glasses in this clip from the interview...
Sundance was watching live; it may have been another clip from the entire interview... such as here http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/10/politics/jeb-bush-donald-trump-carly-fiorina/index.html
I don’t see what the hell you’re talking about. This is such a total non-issue, and it makes those who have hopped on Sundance’s train look like a bunch of kooks. I normally trust his postings for the most part, but this is just a bunch of hullabaloo about NOTHING, and he’s making himself look like a fool for even suggesting it. Bush doesn’t look like he’s reading anything from a teleprompter in that appearance. For anyone who’s actually done video work, it’s a known quantity - you have to have video lights in front of your subject to get a good quality shot. They just happened to probably put the lights a little too low so that they are reflecting right off his glasses, but they are clearly light panels of some kind for video capture.
Sundance wasn’t on my radar until recently, but he’s kick@ss.
Sundance has gone a bit crazy with the anti-Jeb hysteria. You do realize, don’t you, that if you express support for just about ANY candidate other than Donald Trump, that Sundance thinks you’re part of the vast elect-Jeb conspiracy? Almost every one of them that’s running, according to Sundance, is running because the GOPe has asked them to run to somehow, in some way, ensure a Jeb Bush victory in the primary. That may be true for a few, but it’s certainly not true for all, yet in some of those threads over there on TCTH, he’s got nearly every candidate you can name tied into this grand plan.
or this?
Or this?
Should I go on, or could you maybe have Googled on your own to find exactly the dimension/shape of lights that you think might be showing in his glasses?
>
Jindal is just following orders from his CFR masters.
“Should I go on, or could you maybe have Googled on your own to find exactly the dimension/shape of lights that you think might be showing in his glasses?”
******************************************************************************************************
I don’t really care what YOU do. My main point in my initial post was that the unknown lights reflected in Señor Jeb’s glasses were NEITHER television screens or computer monitors as they were not of those products’ current aspect ratios. So you now corrected the DEFICIENCY in your post by showing square lights-—that wasn’t so hard, was it? :^)
It wasn’t a deficiency in my post. It was an EXAMPLE of an LED light. An example! You know what that means, right? We really don’t have to call in the NSA to give us a high-res blowup of the reflection so that I can provide you with a specific model number, do we? Or were you just being deliberately obtuse in your first reply?
“But yes, I wouldn’t rule out them being lights which could certainly be square.”
But, to dispute myself, aren’t those square light panels usually composed of an array of small bulbs or some kind of light emitter?
I think they could possibly be a teleprompter, but why four reflections on his glasses. That doesn’t make sense unless they are 4 lights.
I’m always reminded of Sarah P’s convention speech when this sort of stuff happens. Most people don’t know that her teleprompter went out for a few minutes. Why don’t they know? Because she didn’t skip a beat and kept right on rolling.
He was also reading off cue cards with Colbert, including when he was supposedly spontaneously addressing an issue the way he would naturally.
You’re right, the teleprompter in the photo you sent is almost black from this angle.
Sundance said he saw it near the camera lens.
Maybe the illuminated scroll caught in Jeb’s glasses at some time during the interview ? — CNN only allows for little bits of the interview to post at one time.
We’d have to ask Sundance what he or she saw.
Obviously you haven’t taken Sundance’s GOPe 2016 Victory challenge.
Sundance outlines what we all were SCREAMING about in 2012... the RNC rules change that Mitt, Boehner and Rove shoved down our throats.
Sundance notes other rules and debate schedule changes, and how and why they only benefit Jeb.
Sundance is absolutely correct about why they are splitter candidates.
Plus his analysis of Ted Cruz’s chances are spot on. Nil. Because of the Rove GOPe rule changes.
Sundance is only informing people about the true motivations here, he/she is not saying anyone who backs these other candidates knows what is going on.
I’m sure Sundance has read this book as well: Family of Secrets: the Bush Dynasty
Were you on the CNN set to see the set up?
It is a simple yes or no question.
Didn't see that tweet yet, newfreep.
Sundance: just doing the job the MSM doesn't want to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.