All they should have had to do is to look at history. Historically, there have been no female armies. If females were effective fighters, there would have been.
“and biased toward a belief that men are biologically and psychologically built to be better fighters.”
ANY woman who questions this should be immediately discounted.
It is not mere bias that en are all-around better equipped to be fighters than women. The very same women b1tch about all the probems of the world beibg caused by savage brutal males.
They love the differences when they can criticize men, hate the very same differences when it works against them.
I hope whoever is behind this is done with their carreer.
They will just ruin the careers of the officers in charge, until they get some cowed enough to cravenly say what they want to hear.
It is a bit harder with Marines, but persistent weeding out of counter-revolutionaries will steadily march the program forward.
Besides, they enjoy screwing their political opponents.
As what if they get a chest errr breast wound..will they allow the medic to fix it?? or a crotch wound???
They needed study to figure that out? Maybe they should have just used ALL of human history for their study data and saved a lot of money?
It’s really quite amazing how warped our govt becomes under liberals.
I’ve never cared for the idea of women being frontline soldiers. If they want to pilot vehicles or aircraft, by all means go for it. There are plenty of very effective female pilots.
‘... units with both men and women are less effective than all-male units.”
Give them want they want. All women combat units. That no one simply does this, which is the obvious thing to do to test the effectiveness of women in combat, should tell everyone where they are coming from.
Freegards
When is somebody going to fess up that that particular Army Ranger unit that included those two women, ALL received more rest and food than all other units before and since?
They really need a study for that?!
I don't buy the bit about "psychologically built" but physically, most of us are small and have less muscle mass than men of the same height. In a job where physical strength is an absolute requirement, we *are* at a disadvantage.
“An experimental Marine Corps study obtained by the Monitor has concluded that units with both men and women are less effective than all-male units.”
Good grief, it’s been true since the beginning of fighting history. The sexes are not the same physically, you idiots. The Obama Admin has got to go, fast, and the Pentagon is now stocked with mostly wimps. There should be total Marine mutiny here to stop this. Where are our fighters?
The study needs to be repeated until the proper outcomes are achieved.
And this is experiment is only in training? The israelis tried it and they found that in real combat the performance of mixed units goes down much more markedly, especially when a female becomes a casualty - it has a deeper physiological effect on their male comrades than a male casualty would have. Some aspects of human nature, it seems, can’t be legislated for!