Skip to comments.
Justice Department rules Hillary Clinton followed law in deleting emails
washingtontimes.com ^
| Sep. 10, 2015
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 09/10/2015 10:32:36 AM PDT by PROCON
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: PROCON
The coup is complete and we missed it. There is now one law for the FedMob and one for the peons.
21
posted on
09/10/2015 10:42:00 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
To: PROCON
Gotta admit, this is shocking even to a person who knew Obama was capable of this.
Some of the most top secret information we have, was located on her server.
Hey, no problem...
This White House is out of Control and our Senate and House leaders are missing in action.
22
posted on
09/10/2015 10:42:18 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
To: SuzyQue
Time to appoint and Independent Counsel. Yeah, yeah, I know...
23
posted on
09/10/2015 10:42:20 AM PDT
by
fhayek
To: SaveFerris
She is an EVIL Fabian Socialist Harridan. I hope I live long enough to p*ss on her grave!
24
posted on
09/10/2015 10:42:25 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: mrsmel
David Petraeus is not part of the exclusive clique that can afford to ignore the law that applies to the “99%”.
Herself, Madame Benghazi, the Cold & Joyless, has been “following” the law in accordance to the ruling by the Department of Justice (or “Just-Us”).
Wotta surprise.
25
posted on
09/10/2015 10:42:47 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(If Stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out? - Will Rogers.)
To: PROCON
Its unclear whether Mrs. Clintons review process, which she said involved her lawyers making determinations, qualifies.Her lawyers reviewed her emails? I wonder if they held sufficient clearance to view the potentially secret correspondence.
26
posted on
09/10/2015 10:43:15 AM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: PROCON
Well, there you have it folks, nothing to see here, move along citizens undeserving, low-life minions. There, fixed it!
27
posted on
09/10/2015 10:43:32 AM PDT
by
jda
("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
To: PROCON
You did not think that the “Justice Department” would come out and say she violated the law, did you? Let a Republican do the same thing and see what happens. But, that is what the majority that voted said, via their votes, they wanted.
28
posted on
09/10/2015 10:43:34 AM PDT
by
sport
To: PROCON
WAIT! WAIT!
This is a legal assertion by the JD. This goes before a judge who may very well strike it down and jail the @$$*$ (JD attorneys) who asserted it. Reportedly.
29
posted on
09/10/2015 10:44:55 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
To: PROCON
I guess we will see if the court agrees with this absurd assertion.
30
posted on
09/10/2015 10:45:17 AM PDT
by
chris37
(hearltess)
To: PROCON
3.2 trembler in California attributed to Nixon rolling over in his grave
31
posted on
09/10/2015 10:45:43 AM PDT
by
dblshot
(I am John Galt.)
To: PROCON
Who in the world does the Judge think he is?
32
posted on
09/10/2015 10:45:53 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: DoughtyOne
33
posted on
09/10/2015 10:46:40 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
To: PROCON
Let’s see the next ruling. The Justice Dept may say she had a right to have the server. That’s fine. Have they addressed the top secret emails and how those violated the law?
34
posted on
09/10/2015 10:46:51 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Obama and the leftists - destroying our country one day at a time)
To: PROCON
35
posted on
09/10/2015 10:47:03 AM PDT
by
odawg
To: Diana in Wisconsin
You do not want to do that to the grave of Herself, Madame Benghazi, the Cold & Joyless.
Venomous serpents will strike at your vulnerable privates if such an act is attempted.
36
posted on
09/10/2015 10:47:36 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(If Stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out? - Will Rogers.)
To: sport
You did not think that the Justice Department would come out and say she violated the law, did you? I did have a slight tinge of hope that even the 0bama Regime were tired of the Clintons too.
Silly me.
37
posted on
09/10/2015 10:47:38 AM PDT
by
PROCON
(GOD will NOT be mocked!)
To: PROCON
Well, there you have it folks, nothing to see here, move along citizens.
38
posted on
09/10/2015 10:47:55 AM PDT
by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: PROCON
Well I’m satisfied, she did nothing wrong! It was just a vast right-wing conspiracy that wants to keep from her rightful crown. We can now get back to why Hillary is the most amazing awesome woman in the history of the universe and shy we are sooooo fortunate to have her run for monarch and the occupant of the imperial throne.
39
posted on
09/10/2015 10:48:22 AM PDT
by
DaveyB
(Live free or die!)
To: PROCON
John Edwards, as much as I hate to admit it, was correct...there are 2 Americas.
40
posted on
09/10/2015 10:48:26 AM PDT
by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson