Posted on 09/05/2015 6:30:01 AM PDT by HomerBohn
What’s the difference between this case and Kim Davis?
You perform the requirements of the job.
If you don’t like the requirements of the job, you quit.
Trump had the correct response. He’s consistent and smart.
“What’s the difference between this case and Kim Davis?
Kim Davis has a government job. Having said that, she could have been accommodated especially since the law was changed after she was elected.
Fire her.
There is nothing in the Koran that prevents a Moslem from serving alcohol to an infidel. It only says that Moslems cannot drink alcoholic beverages.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Goes to show that their are certain people out there trying to get the law to work in such a way that they can have their cake & eat it,too. Then they want to prevent it from working this way for others. We need something we don’t have right now in this country.....real leadership.
Sorry for the grammar error in the first sentence.
***Fire her ignorant ass!***
Agreed! She is not touching the product. It is in a sealed bottle!
Islam IS evil.
“get the law to work in such a way that they can have their cake and eat it too”! Does this sound similar to the Sweet cakes by Melissa Oregon lawsuit?
No law was changed ! The supreme court made a ruling, not a law. How can she follow a ruling? It is not a law? And if you think that we are no longer a representative republic then continue to accept this deceit.
She could just as well have been hired by a tavern to work as a barmaid. Everyone knows that barmaids serve alcohol and everyone knows that flight attendants serve alcohol. You can’t do either job if you refuse to serve alcohol.
This is what makes the Kim Davis question tough.
Most freepers here are quick to side with the law in the case of the muslim woman, but not so in the case of the Christian woman.
The argument in defense of Davis needs to be grounded on something other than religious freedom or else we’re going to be hypocritical.
Quite the oincidence that she converted to Islam a month after taking that job. NOT! She’s an activist.
The goal of the homosexuals is to force conservatives to justify/endorse homosexual based marriage licenses. Use the enemy against the enemy rule for radicals.
This happened at Disneyland too.
The push is on. They won’t relent. Unless we stop them.
Reminds me of the vegetarian lady chef on a popular cooking show—she was complaining bitterly about having to cook meat.
No one assured her there would be no meat; to the contrary, she knew there would be various kinds of meat on the menu.
As here, I’m fed up with the the ROP and our muslim CIC.
Have you noticed there are no women in most of the photos of the Syrian “refugees”. They are all young, vigorous males.
Why do you think that is? “Honor killings” are a distraction from the serious business of invasion.
To: HomerBohn
Totally different... Kim davis was elected, mo ho was hired
9 posted on September 5, 2015 9:57:11 AM EDT by teeman8r
Get your own alcohol and ban this farce the supreme court calls marriage. Marriage is a religious covenant, not a govt union.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.