This is what makes the Kim Davis question tough.
Most freepers here are quick to side with the law in the case of the muslim woman, but not so in the case of the Christian woman.
The argument in defense of Davis needs to be grounded on something other than religious freedom or else we’re going to be hypocritical.
The goal of the homosexuals is to force conservatives to justify/endorse homosexual based marriage licenses. Use the enemy against the enemy rule for radicals.
What law are freepers siding with in the case of the muslim? What law are they not siding with in the case of theChristian woman?