As defined by religion.
There is no test in the US that one must be religious in order to get married.
You can disagree, but that doesn’t change what the Supreme Court has decided.
You don’t have to like it. It isn’t required that you like it.
But until we change the laws so that the Supreme Court can decide these sorts of things, government officials should follow what legal means have said is the current law.
You don’t get it.
I AM TALKING ABOUT BIOLOGY.
I am addressing the meaning of “marriage” in every society since antiquity, including these United States ... and FWIW, the laws of the State of Kentucky agree with biological reality.
The Supreme Court is wrong.
YOU are wrong.
Neither you nor the Supreme Court evidence the faintest idea what “marriage” is. Neither you nor the Supreme Court evidence the faintest comprehension that “Man” and “Woman” are by nature not interchangeable; that they are by nature distinct categories of “thing”.
“Marriage” is a relationship between a MAN and a WOMAN, based on their complementary biology and different nature. It is nothing else. It has never BEEN anything else. It cannot BE anything else. And that reality is NOT dependent on any particular religion.