You don’t get it.
I AM TALKING ABOUT BIOLOGY.
I am addressing the meaning of “marriage” in every society since antiquity, including these United States ... and FWIW, the laws of the State of Kentucky agree with biological reality.
The Supreme Court is wrong.
YOU are wrong.
Neither you nor the Supreme Court evidence the faintest idea what “marriage” is. Neither you nor the Supreme Court evidence the faintest comprehension that “Man” and “Woman” are by nature not interchangeable; that they are by nature distinct categories of “thing”.
“Marriage” is a relationship between a MAN and a WOMAN, based on their complementary biology and different nature. It is nothing else. It has never BEEN anything else. It cannot BE anything else. And that reality is NOT dependent on any particular religion.
That is a RELIGIOUS definition.
No one is mandated by government that they must reproduce in order to have a civil marriage.
No one.
I AM TALKING ABOUT BIOLOGY.
Biology doesn’t require that two people be married in order to procreate.
There is no biological prerequisite to be married. The law currently states that any two adults not closely related can get married.
They don’t have to procreate. They don’t have to have sex. All that is required is a desire to be seen in the eye of the law as married.