>>> ..... based on their appearance
The premise of theie study is faulty.
My gaydar does not base on appearance alone.
Today’s colleges and universities seem to “breed” that foppish, floppy manner and NPR-Speak tone of effeminate semi-uber-class speech deliberately.
I agree with you: It isn’t the foppish posture or limp-wristed hand-waving, nor the tone or lisp nor non-purposed, vacillation and wavering speech tones, nor the chin beard and mustache (WHAT? Can’t a homosexual receive oral sex without simulating a woman’s vaginal hair??) and either uber-macho muscles or uber-feminine Euro-model nothingness.
It is some combination of all of those factors. It’s long been said about animals: “Don’t let them smell your fear. Stand up to them as an aggressor.”
Well, in today’s world, the homo’s ARE the aggressor - only they are hiding behind a woman reporter’s skirts.
But they need to show that physical traits program a person’s sexual behavior like a programmer writes an operating system. That’s what the politically correct attitude is. People are not responsible for sexual behavior.