Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JewishRighter

Jailed?

So a state or federal employee who refuses to perform job function X can be jailed, instead of simply fired?


5 posted on 09/03/2015 10:43:24 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mbarker12474

In another article I read that she is an elected official, and therefore cannot be fired. She can however, resign.


10 posted on 09/03/2015 10:45:46 AM PDT by fredhead (Join the Navy and see the world.....77% of which is covered in water.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mbarker12474
So a state or federal employee who refuses to perform job function X can be jailed, instead of simply fired?

She wasn't jailed for refusing to perform her job function, she was jailed for refusing a court order to perform her job function. And as an elected official she can't be fired. Only impeached or voted out of office.

17 posted on 09/03/2015 10:47:50 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mbarker12474

Jailed?

So a state or federal employee who refuses to perform job function X can be jailed, instead of simply fired?

Here, let me try it: So a state or federal employee who refuses to report illegal aliens to ICE because they believe it to be immoral and declares the city they administrate to be a haven from federal immigration law can be jailed instead of simply fired? Hmmm...


19 posted on 09/03/2015 10:48:30 AM PDT by big truck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mbarker12474; flaglady47; mickie; Maine Mariner; pax_et_bonum
She's an elected official, so she can't be fired.

She can be booted out by the voters at her next election...or, under Kentucky law, she can be impeached by her state legislature.

But "fired", no.

Leni

28 posted on 09/03/2015 10:51:33 AM PDT by MinuteGal (It's Not "Immigration", Stupid....IT'S INVASION !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mbarker12474

Dozens of N.C. magistrates refuse to perform gay marriages

RALEIGH, N.C. —The number of North Carolina magistrates recusing themselves from performing civil marriages under a new law has more than doubled in recent weeks.

The state court system says it’s received 32 notices from magistrates since the law took effect June 11. That’s up from 14 in early July and represents nearly 5 percent of the state’s magistrates.

The law exempts court officials with sincerely held religious beliefs opposing gay marriage.

The law also gave the recusal option to some register of deeds workers issuing marriage licenses. Elected officials would perform the duties as a last resort.

http://www.wyff4.com/news/Dozens-of-N-C-magistrates-refuse-to-perform-gay-marriages/35083282?utm_source=Social&utm_medium=FBPAGE&utm_campaign=WYFF%20News%204&Content%20Type=Story


38 posted on 09/03/2015 10:59:02 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mbarker12474

She can’t be fired. She was elected and therefore must be impeached to be removed from her job.

From what I heard, if they did impeach her and she ran again she would be re-elected.


48 posted on 09/03/2015 11:08:20 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Chris Stevens won't be running for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson