Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I wonder what Obamadork has done to make Ms. Graham think he is not a muslim.
3 posted on
09/02/2015 7:18:41 AM PDT by
jospehm20
To: E. Pluribus Unum
BAD move, Mr. Gramnesty.
People (ie. VOTERS) might just start PAYING ATTENTION to that little topic.
NOT good—for youse guys.
4 posted on
09/02/2015 7:19:28 AM PDT by
Flintlock
(Our soapbox is gone, the ballot box stolen--we're left with the bullet box now.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Graham’s main goal in life is to piss on conservatives. What a worthless sack.
5 posted on
09/02/2015 7:21:17 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The mere fact that he uses the made up term “isil” is an automatic disqualifier.
6 posted on
09/02/2015 7:21:40 AM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Is Linda trying to be relevant again?
7 posted on
09/02/2015 7:22:03 AM PDT by
wjcsux
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Carpet bomb the ISIS oil fields now!
Muslim recruiting goes up when they are winning - and drops when they lose.
8 posted on
09/02/2015 7:22:11 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
All you have to do is say his name and what does it sound like? Also Graham is irrelevant. Can’t get above 1% he is just in it to run interference.
10 posted on
09/02/2015 7:23:35 AM PDT by
Busko
(The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I would have retorted that Ms. Lindsay consolidates all of the GOPers who think Bruce Jenner is now truly a woman, but polling numbers indicate that the senator doesn’t have anywhere near that level of support.
12 posted on
09/02/2015 7:25:38 AM PDT by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
13 posted on
09/02/2015 7:27:11 AM PDT by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Linda’s having a hissy over the truth?
14 posted on
09/02/2015 7:27:17 AM PDT by
laweeks
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Isn’t it nice Lindsey has such a low opinion of Republican voters. While insulting us he is begging for our support.
15 posted on
09/02/2015 7:27:27 AM PDT by
Yogafist
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Another politician with 0% and 0 credibility. Why are we paying these cons in CONgre$$?
16 posted on
09/02/2015 7:27:31 AM PDT by
PGalt
To: E. Pluribus Unum
At less than 1% popularity Graham has got to be a big disappointment to the Yeb campaign.
Yap louder, Linda!
17 posted on
09/02/2015 7:28:14 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I think it was Rush who said Graham is clearly doing nothing but shilling for the Republican Cartel. He declared himself a candidate simply to gain a soapbox to assist the Cartel in bringing down any non-establishment candidate. He never stood a chance in hell of becoming a legitimate candidate and that it was never his objective.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And what is the profile of your block of supporters, Grahamnesty?
19 posted on
09/02/2015 7:30:54 AM PDT by
SharpRightTurn
(Been shown repeatedly that Mittens would not have won with 70% of the “Hispanic vote”. What killed)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I rest my case. The WSJ, in an earlier thread, accused Donnie Trump of picking on Linda like a grade school bully. I rebutted that Linda had provoked and invited his a$$-whuppin’.
Now, here we go again. Sister Grahamnesty, who is currently polling between ZERO and ONE, has poked a stick at the 800 lb. gorilla again. And what does she suppose it will do for her? Launch her poll numbers all the way up to TWO?
Recent history shows that when various hopefuls taunted the Donald, their poll numbers FELL. Wouldn’t it be more profitable if Linda spoke out about her core principles, instead? Maybe. But maybe she has none to speak about. She didn’t exhibit any when she was an ambulance chasing lawyer. Only IMHO, of course.
20 posted on
09/02/2015 7:39:12 AM PDT by
Tucker39
(Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Trump has consolidated all the “crazies” who think Linda’s gay.
21 posted on
09/02/2015 7:42:29 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(RINOs EARNED TRUMP! I prefer Cruz, but someone has to kick their A$$!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
‘Linda’ get your panties in a bunch much?
22 posted on
09/02/2015 7:48:33 AM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Trump’s candidacy has proven that Lindsey is a loose cannon, particularly in the areas of immigration and foreign policy.
24 posted on
09/02/2015 7:52:49 AM PDT by
Will88
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson