[Teotwawki]

My wife and I actually had that discussion. We had our first child later in life. Because of our age, they recommended testing for Down’s in utero,. There was a very small chance that the test itself would harm the baby. It took about 30 seconds of discussion for us to agree that we wouldn't have the test as we wouldn't abort the baby even if it came back positive for Downs.

[DoughtyOne]

Good for you.

[stanne]

Amniocentesis.

No I don’t want one. Had one sonogram after a bout with the worst flu known to man.

Why did I do it? Reassurance

Sonograms are going to be found out to be more harmful than anything including vaccines once people pull their heads out and realiz

Amino?

No

[vette6387]

“My wife and I actually had that discussion. We had our first child later in life. Because of our age, they recommended testing for Down’s in utero,. There was a very small chance that the test itself would harm the baby. It took about 30 seconds of discussion for us to agree that we wouldn’t have the test as we wouldn’t abort the baby even if it came back positive for Downs. “

We were “encouraged” by the State of California to have my wife tested when she had our third child at 42 ( 14 years after the first two ). We went through the agony of the waiting but as you point out we would not have terminated the pregnancy for Downs ( which is what the State hoped we would do if the results were positive). We now have a 32 year old daughter who is an absolute delight. Lifetime parenting has been wonderful. I want to cry when I see the PP videos. Mengle could not be worse than these people.