No, I think it means the emails SHOULD have been classified. Its bad for her because sensitive information was on her server that was not properly classified. Now that the emails have been reviewed it has been determined that the information needs the appropriate classification on them. That’s what this story is saying.
Bill Clinton, “ It all depends on the meaning of “is”.
Hillary! Clinton, “ It all depends on the meaning of “was”.
She was Secretary of State, for Heaven’s sake, after spending many years in government.
Was she not able to see that the content of emails should have been CLASSIFIED. What a breathtakingly stupid SOS we relied on for our national safety.
I understand the story, but just playing devil’s advocate...
How is that Hillary’s fault? If it wasn’t classified at the time, then she didn’t violate any protocol in that regard, right? How could she have? “I didn’t send or receive any classified information”.........
That’s going to be made into a true statement. How could she have known????
Mark my words.
Its bad for her because sensitive information was on her server that was not properly classified.
Even tho as SoS she should’ve known what information that should have been classified, that’s what her “out” will be blaming some poor slug who sent it to her
YES, it does mean that.
Even without any marking .. Hillary should have known it was classified material when she got it .. and she should have marked it accordingly .. BEFORE SHE SENT IT ON TO ANYONE ELSE.
SHE’S A LIAR AND CRIMINAL AND SHE SHOULD BE INDICTED AND PUT IN JAIL.