[WayneS]

Your basic premise is flawed.

Illegal immigration is not the only issue, and if you think it is then you are what is known as a low information voter.

[Fantasywriter]

So you believe a country can be sovereign with wide open borders? You believe the current flood of foreign invaders can continue without (further and irrevocably) destroying the social fabric of America, along with its economy? You’re fine with rapidly sliding toward third world status? The fact that foreign invaders already enjoy more rights, privileges and benefits than US citizens is fine with you?

[jpsb]

Illegal immigration is not the only issue

Actually (illegal) immigration it is the only issue that matters this election cycle. You are going to have to make a better argument then "No it not and you are stupid".

From a difference thread

"Trump is right about immigration and on that issue alone he's earned the vote of every thinking American. Let the left import 60 million more Marxist voters and the USA is finished as a sovereign nation. Think 60 million is an inflated number? Consider this, there are probably 20 to 30 million illegals here right now. Grant them citizenship and then they have the right to bring family here. 20 million bringing just two family members is 60 million. If 20 mil bring 5 family that's 120 million."

Trump is the only candidate running that is credible on the issue of immigration. Not Cruz, not Walker not Paul. Only Trump is credible. Only Trump made immigration the center point of his campaign. The others could have but declined to do so. Trump owns the most important issue of our times. All the rest are "me too" candidates that will fold in a NY second if elected.

[Behind the Blue Wall]

If you think the Republican Party or conservatism or liberty has any sort of chance in an environment where the entire country has California’s demographics, then sure, it’s not the only issue.

[gogeo]

Actually, I'd say he was closer to the mark than you. Immigration (and all the parts of it) are the consequential issues. All the others are secondary.

We can agree or disagree on candidates and issues. These debates assume our votes are viable vehicles for change...as someone once said, when we get angry, we don't riot...we vote.

That only works if our votes count. Combine voter fraud with open borders...hell, Obama has been advertising for them, telling them how to safely cross, flying in non citizens.

We may have already reached a tipping point where we can't effectively vote for change. If not, the next eight years will surely get us there.

That's the opposite of a LIV. Your comment does not reflect well upon you.