[faithhopecharity]

true.
differences between Obama/Iran and Munich...

1. Chamberlain was a subject/citizen and patriot of the country he led.
2. Great Britain was very weak and many military experts said it could not handle war with Germany, that time at least was needed to prepare.
3. Munich did not enable Hitler to acquire nuclear bombs (though of course he later went hard to work trying to make them)
4. Munich did not reward Hitler with $150 Billion
5. Hitler was at least talking like he ‘wanted peace’ — an obvious deception, even then, yes.... but he played the part of a peacemaker with Chamberlain (unlike Iran which to this very day is still averring its plans to destroy USA)

but yes, Munich is probably the best comparison available
.. its just that Munich was, for all its disasterous short-sightedness — not nearly as dangerous as what Obama is doing to America TODAY
4.

[justiceseeker93]

Thanks for pointing out those dissimilarities between the Munich Pact and the Obama Iran deal.

The bottom line is that the Obama Iran deal is even more dangerous than the Munich Pact proved to be!

[ETL]

In short, Chamberlain was naive. Obama is a deliberate saboteur.