To: SeekAndFind
The climactic moment of the movie, as it was of the debates, comes after the moderator, Howard K. Smith, refers to the fact that some of the antiwar demonstrators in Grant Park had brandished Vietcong flags prior to the police onslaught. Here, in full, is the relevant frank exchange of views:
SMITH: Mr. Vidal, wasnt it a provocative act to try to raise the Vietcong flag in the park in the film we just saw? Wouldnt that inviteraising the Nazi flag during World War II would have had similar consequences.
VIDAL: You must realize what some of the political issues are here. There are many people in the United States who happen to believe that the United States policy is wrong in Vietnam and the Vietcong are correct in wanting to organize their own country in their own way politically. This happens to be pretty much the opinion of Western Europe and many other parts of the world. If it is a novelty in Chicago, that is too bad, but I assume that the point of the American democracy
BUCKLEY: (interrupting): and some people were pro-Nazi
VIDAL: is you can express any view you want
BUCKLEY: and some people were pro-Nazi
VIDAL: Shut up a minute!
BUCKLEY: No, I wont. Some people were pro-Nazi and, and the answer is they were well treated by people who ostracized them. And Im for ostracizing people who egg on other people to shoot American Marines and American soldiers. I know you dont care
VIDAL (loftily): As far as Im concerned, the only pro- or crypto-Nazi I can think of is yourself. Failing that
SMITH: Lets, lets not call names
VIDAL: Failing that, I can only say that
BUCKLEY (snarling, teeth bared): Now listen, you queer, stop calling me a crypto-Nazi or Ill sock you in your goddam face, and youll stay plastered
(Everybody talks at once. Unintelligible.)
SMITH: Gentlemen!
2 posted on
08/29/2015 7:01:30 AM PDT by
SeekAndFind
(What is the difference between Obama and government bonds? Government bonds will mature someday)
To: SeekAndFind
That was political, Newman replied. Yours was personal. Newman, you self-righteous dork. You were too old-fashioned to admit that the "personal," where homosexuality was concerned, had already become political.
To: SeekAndFind
Its funny that I saw that particular program. We were in a isolated area and only one channel could be picked up so we were watching it when all the cursing began...Shocked I tell you.
Vidal was being a jerk and provoked it...
4 posted on
08/29/2015 7:08:26 AM PDT by
virgil283
(Those who said 'we can't legislate morality', now demand we legislate their morality.)
To: SeekAndFind
The Gore is the same Gore as Al Gore as they are family
5 posted on
08/29/2015 7:14:07 AM PDT by
Mikey_1962
(Democrats have destroyed more cities than Godzilla)
To: SeekAndFind
Vidal would argue that the very lack of proof of a militaryindustrial cabal was evidence enough of its existence And THAT, my FRiends, is the core of liberal "logic." If you see it, it's proof that it exists. But even if you don't, it's still proof. In other words, even if it's not there, it's there. Because you can't find it.
7 posted on
08/29/2015 7:20:48 AM PDT by
IronJack
To: SeekAndFind
Vidal was strictly homosexual and displayed a detectable self-loathing about this.
Here is the Cliff note version.
9 posted on
08/29/2015 7:21:20 AM PDT by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: SeekAndFind
I don’t know anything about his personal life. His historical fiction is fantastic.
13 posted on
08/29/2015 7:29:12 AM PDT by
Lisbon1940
(No full-term governors)
To: SeekAndFind
A great novelist and a great essayist. He’s unsurpassed in modern American literary criticism. Eat your heart out, Mr. Buckley, you couldn’t come close to “Burr” or “Lincoln.”
14 posted on
08/29/2015 7:33:03 AM PDT by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
To: SeekAndFind
15 posted on
08/29/2015 7:33:08 AM PDT by
originalbuckeye
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: SeekAndFind
21 posted on
08/29/2015 7:51:36 AM PDT by
davisfh
To: SeekAndFind
22 posted on
08/29/2015 7:52:01 AM PDT by
davisfh
To: SeekAndFind
Vidal had the epiphany that America was a fascist security state. He claimed that the militaryindustrial complex had kicked into high gear during the presidency of Harry Truman, whose Cold War containment policies he saw as part of an effort to bolster the economy by maintaining a permanent state of war. Vidal would cling to this worldview no matter the counter-evidence. Like Oliver Stone, Vidal would argue that the very lack of proof of a militaryindustrial cabal was evidence enough of its existence and its control over American lives. Vidal viewed every unpredictable event through this prism. The Soviets invasion of Afghanistan was the result of the American militaryindustrial complexs goading them into this venture in order to bleed them dry and, by doing so, remove them from the running for the militaryindustrial-complex sweepstakes. Vidal believed that these maneuverings, not ordinary peoples desire for freedom, led to the Soviet Unions collapse. Gore Vidal may have been many things, a despicable man and wrong on many things but, how was he not correct about this? We are in a permanent state of war, the NSA is spying on us all at any time, really at all times. The military has been purged of dissenting voices and experience at winning strategy to prolong conflicts without victory. Guns and bandages, that is the largest export of America. Without those what would our GDP look like? We are "The Lords of War".
27 posted on
08/29/2015 9:02:02 AM PDT by
Glad2bnuts
(If God himself said every 50 years debt should be erased, and land returned, who am I to disagree?)
To: SeekAndFind
That exchange shows nothing but a couple of guys at the end of their ropes. We've all been there.
What IS important, however, is that there once was a weekly TV show in our country where two individuals sat and discussed important issues over the course of 60 or 90 minutes. Buckley's contribution to this puts us eternally in his debt. Would that this concept would be, or could be, brought back. But alas, the hyper-focus on a 30 second name-calling exchange generating so much attention illustrates the demise of a cerebral culture with an attention span, and the rise of one unbridled with neither the interest nor the requisite habit of self-control to engage in one topic for an extended period.
34 posted on
08/29/2015 10:49:16 AM PDT by
jobim
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson