Posted on 08/27/2015 5:45:42 AM PDT by thackney
Southern Company isnt alone in spending billions to position itself for the natural gas future.
One of the largest companies that owns utilities in the U.S., Southern Company, announced a big deal this week that highlights just how aggressively power firms are looking to boost their natural gas power resources at the expense of the declining coal industry.
On Monday, Southern Company SO 2.61% said it plans to buy natural-gas distributor AGL Resources GAS -0.08% for $8 billion in cash. The deal, which is for $12 billion but includes $4 billion in debt, offers AGL shareholders a 38% premium over AGLs stock price when the deal first closed.
When combined, the new company will be the second largest U.S. utility with 9 million customers, and will be positioned with AGLs natural gas pipeline. Bloomberg estimates that the combined companys natural gas use will grow 22% from 1.8 billion cubic feet a day to 2.2 billion cubic feet a day by 2020.
Coal plants, which currently provide 39% of U.S. electricity, have closed all over the U.S. in recent years. Twenty three gigawattsor 7% of US coal capacitywill be taken offline this year, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. For comparisons sake, a large coal plant can have enough capacity for about one gigawatt.
The retrenchment is partly due to the abundance of lower cost natural gas that has become readily available from shale deposits in states like Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Texas. By some estimates the U.S. now has 360 trillion cubic feet of proven natural gas in the ground that can be recovered.
Its also because federal environmental regulations have startedand will likely continueto push dirtier-burning coal out of business. Older coal plants have had to undergo expensive upgrades to make them cleaner, and many of their owners have opted to just shut them down instead of retool them.
That transition will likely continue if President Obamas controversial Clean Power Plan remains in effect. The mandate, developed with the Environmental Protection Agency and recently finalized, imposes rougher rules on power plant operators to lower greenhouse gas emissions.
Many carbon emissions in the power sector come from coal plants. The Clean Power Plan is expected to help boost natural gas use while substantially cutting coal use.
Theres so many decommissioned coal plants that companies are being creative in how they reuse the newly vacant land. Google, for example, says it plans to build a new data center at an aging coal plant in rural Alabama.
This transition means that the coal industry is in real trouble. According to analysts, coal producers revenues have dropped at least 25% over the past three years while their profits have turned into losses. As a result, coal companies are cutting jobs. Meanwhile, some like Alpha Natural Resources, which lost $875 million in 2014, have filed for bankruptcy.
This shift in the energy industry means that big utilities like Southern Company have been forced to shed coal assets. Over the years, the company has announced plans to close over a dozen coal plants. But in keeping with its big billion dollar deal this week, Southern Company is pushing more into natural gas. Currently, 42% of its power generation from coal and 39% from natural gaswith those numbers. Down the road, natural gas could become its dominant power source.
“The retrenchment is partly due to the abundance of lower cost natural gas”... and that’s fine and appropriate. It takes into account the (guessed) cost of natural gas over the 50 year lifetime of the plant. In 20 years demand for Natural gas may have skyrocketed forcing the price up.
But forcing conversions by adding an idiotic regulatory factor into the costs is a recipe for future disaster.
Ah, those mythical “greenhouse gasses”
We’ll find them, no matter how many people die for the cause.
Giant Coal Company Bankruptcy Reveals Secret Ties to Climate Denial, GOP Dark Money Groups
The USA literally sits on a mountain of coal. And we are just ignoring this energy source.
but, is natural gas cheaper than preobama coal?
In my view, eliminating or trying to eliminate coal as a viable source of energy is a big mistake. Just in the interest of diversifying our sources of energy seems a prudent way to go.
Using coal can be made to be more environmentally friendly without destroying or severely curtailing their operations, and without bankrupting them.
Interesting that Soros has bought, or plans to buy, hundreds of thousands of shares of now near bankrupt coal companies Peabody Energy and Arch Coal. What is it that GS knows? Mabye coal isn’t dead, it’s just a game to take it away from us on the cheap.
While George Soros is buying coal mining company stock.
That’s the real question and letting the market decide is the best course of action. The next POTUS is in the dream position of simply being able to move us back to 2007-level regulations* and watching the economy boom.
* including repealing Democratcare.

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.
Obamas Focus in Oil-Rich Alaska Is Climate Change--As Putin Deploys Warships
Greens: Obama climate legacy at risk over Arctic drilling
Alaskans concerned Obama visit a ploy to highlight green legacy
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.