There was an article posted to FR recently. It's author was someone who purported to be in the class, and he disagreed.
I've no idea if the article was BS, or not. Will look around for it.
I know nothing about Ranger training, as I'm not military. However, it would not surprise me that there are two women - maybe even a handful more - out of the 10's of thousands in the military who could get through Ranger training, particularly with a little nudge here and there.
Does that mean ALL women are perfectly capable, or that it's a good idea to have women in the field as Rangers? Hardly.
But that's what we're seeing in the MSM. "Anything you can do, I can do better." Bunk.
I saw that on a thread...my impression, and that of many, is that the guy who wrote it was one of those people who stuck his finger in the air, saw which way the wind was definitely blowing, and didn’t want to be on the rank-inhibiting side that states women in combat is a bad idea.
Anyone currently active duty is required to agree with all the policies of this administration on the pains of severe ramifications. Sorry, but you cannot trust the testimony of service members under the thumb of this regime, which hates the military with a passion and is trying to undermine it at every turn.
Same with the Marine outfit that was "just fine" with the openly "gay" unit member. It's all bullshit.
I remember in Florida Phase in 1978 getting 1 and 1/3 meals a day, they gave us 4 LERPS or C-Rats for 3 days.