Skip to comments.
Fargo police 'apologetic' after mistaking students' telescope for a gun
Grand Forks HerLd ^
| August 26, 2015
| Aaron Burner
Posted on 08/26/2015 9:36:00 AM PDT by skeptoid
FARGO A pair of NDSU students got quite the scare Monday night when armed Fargo police officers mistook their telescope for a rifle.
(Excerpt) Read more at grandforksherald.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; police; telescope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: arthurus
Maybe he should paint the edge of the telescope orange......................
41
posted on
08/26/2015 10:17:24 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: skeptoid
Even if the boys had a rifle and “tactical” vest (what ever that is), they were breaking no laws. Tyhose cops need shooting and fire the survivors. They are a hazard to the community.
To: skeptoid
Levi Joraanstad and Colin Waldera were setting up the large device to take pictures of the moon behind their apartment's garage on Dakota Dr. N when they were blinded by a bright light and told to stop moving.
But because they couldn't see who was shining the light at them, they thought it was all a dumb joke.
Authorities say an officer patrolling the area had spotted the two out of the corner of his eye, and thought Joraanstad's dark colored sweater with white lettering on the back looked like a tactical vest and that he might be carrying a rifle.
He checked area agencies to make sure none had any operations going on before he called for backup.
Three or four officers made verbal contact.
Joraanstad says what was especially frightening was what could have happened, he says the two originally thought the whole thing was a prank by some neighboring college students they had talked to earlier and continued digging in their bags - ignoring the officers shouting.
"I was kind of fumbling around with my stuff and my roommate and I were kind of talking, we were kind of wondering, what the heck's going on?" said NDSU junior Levi Joraanstad. "This is pretty dumb that these guys are doing this. And then they started shouting to quit moving or we could be shot. And so at that moment we kind of look at each other and we're thinking we better take this seriously."
Police say the two were never in any danger and that it was a situation of "better safe than sorry."
Joraanstad says the officers were very apologetic when they realized their mistake, and that they explained what had happened.
SWAT was not called in.
To: skeptoid
I guess they went to a Kolluge where there were no telescopes?
To: skeptoid
“Police say the two were never in any danger and that it was a situation of “better safe than sorry.” “
Being within a second or two of being shot to death is not my idea of “never being in danger.”
If the officer mistook their sweaters for tactical vests, what does this mean to a police officer that might have to shoot? I’m thinking, “Aim for the head”.
45
posted on
08/26/2015 10:42:54 AM PDT
by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: arthurus
http://www.grandforksherald.com/sites/default/files/styles/full_1000/public/field/image/telescope.jpg?itok=qyZr4bz- Good point.
And proven by more than 2 or 3 examples in recent years.
46
posted on
08/26/2015 10:47:12 AM PDT
by
skeptoid
(I'm a sucker for pulchritude)
To: jdege
Remember, when you see someone carrying a telescope around, its probably after dark.Nah, I prefer looking at the sun through a telescope. ;)
47
posted on
08/26/2015 10:47:58 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: skeptoid
I think there may be something not quite right with your police work there, Norm.
To: arthurus
http://www.grandforksherald.com/sites/default/files/styles/full_1000/public/field/image/telescope.jpg?itok=qyZr4bz- Good point.
And proven by more than 2 or 3 examples in recent years.
49
posted on
08/26/2015 10:52:22 AM PDT
by
skeptoid
(I'm a sucker for pulchritude)
To: jdege
Could be doing solar observing. Gotta have great filters for that though.
50
posted on
08/26/2015 11:16:22 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Zaphod Beeblebrox for president! Or Cruz if Zaphod is unavailable.)
To: skeptoid
Chinese Type 79 anti-tank missile launcher:
I could see that mistake being made.
51
posted on
08/26/2015 11:20:54 AM PDT
by
PLMerite
("The issue is never the issue. The issue is the Revolution.")
To: PLMerite
Because soooo many police in North Dakota are familiar with Chinese anti-tank weaponry, because they are used so often in North Dakota crimes.
52
posted on
08/26/2015 11:27:36 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: skeptoid
that is a fully auto telescope - nothing semi-auto about that model
To: Teacher317; jdege
I used my schools telescope to point at the sun and project the image onto a white surface to count sunspots....so, yes, you can use a telescope during the day.
54
posted on
08/26/2015 12:07:16 PM PDT
by
June2
To: Teacher317
Familiar, no. But if you were in the military, or have another professional interest like me, you do have the general shape in the back of your head.
55
posted on
08/26/2015 12:17:01 PM PDT
by
PLMerite
("The issue is never the issue. The issue is the Revolution.")
To: skeptoid
To: Red Badger
Here, LEOs are required to have a college degree A college degree doesn't guarantee that someone has common sense.
57
posted on
08/26/2015 4:03:32 PM PDT
by
TangoLimaSierra
(To win the country back, we need to be as mean as the libs say we are.)
To: skeptoid
Telescopes are considered weapons by ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations).
Personally, I think this is a correct classification due to the military usefulness of telescopes, binoculars, and especially space-based telescopes.
OTOH, I very much doubt that Law Enforcement in Fargo was thinking of ITAR at the time.
To: PLMerite
I once watched a partial solar eclipse the same way, where the image was projected thru a telescope onto a translucent screen.
59
posted on
08/27/2015 9:22:47 AM PDT
by
jonascord
(It's sarcasm unless otherwise noted... This time, it's not.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson