Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: verga
I have no problem with "civil unions" that would allow tax benefits and other legal rights, but Marriage is strictly limited to a man and a woman.

A rose; by any other name; would be called something else.

209 posted on 08/26/2015 6:53:04 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie
A rose; by any other name; would be called something else.

Not true Civil unions are performed by judges, justices of the peace, ship's captains etc... They grant legal status, but are not viewed as religious.

One performed by an ordained minister/ priest is by definition religious and should have God's place in the marriage as it's focus. It also gives legal status, but that is secondary to God's blessing to the couple.

218 posted on 08/27/2015 3:13:27 AM PDT by verga (I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson