I thought I was the only one that noticed. :)
Million Dollar legs
Posted on 08/25/2015 2:14:02 AM PDT by elhombrelibre
Donald Trump relaunched his bitter war of words with Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly Monday night, blasting her return to the air after an unexpected hiatus.
“I liked The Kelly File much better without @megynkelly,” Trump tweeted. “Perhaps she could take another eleven day unscheduled vacation!”
The Republican candidate’s critique of Kelly was the latest in a revenge campaign since the two clashed over the GOP presidential debate on Aug . 6
He tuned in Monday night to attack her return to the anchor desk.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
But the Media(”conservative” or liberal-leftist)continue to:
#1 Ignore Ted Cruz
Or label Ted Cruz as:
#2 “Tea Party Right Winger”
#3 “An out of the mainstream Right Wing firebrand”
#4 “Un-electable ultra-conservative”
#5 “Married to a Wall Street insider”
#6 “In favor of government shut-down”
#7 “Member of the Religious Right thus he’s a racist, sexist, homophobe”
But as we know, remaining quiet, respectful, and displaying a thoughtful demeanor with a grasp of the “issues” matters most to an American voting public half of whom have the IQ of a frying pan.
Yeah, compassionate conservatism has been nothing but a roaring success against a Liberal Left Wing that will stop at nothing to destroy the American Republic as it was founded. I’m beginning to think that the term “Dreamers” is misapplied.
You probably need to add Luntz to that list, also.
What does it say for FOX when Greta is the most fair and balanced commentator on the network?
I Tivo FOX talking heads because fast forward makes it possible to watch some of them. I removed Kelly about two months back when she became blatantly obvious in her progressive ways. Replaced her with Greta who is more balanced than all the rest. Sad days indeed.
Well, I just came off a thread which describes some woman finding Trump’s face in a tub of butter.
It was remarked on the thread that Trump is more popular than the Virgin Mary. So you see the mentality involved here.
If only your candidate could figure out why Trump is beloved.
Which 7 percenter are you pulling for?
If only.
Someone who’s polling higher than Sarah Palin.
Elections have been fought with “Democrat Manners” for at least the last couple of decades. Problem is the GOP would bring boxing gloves to a back-alley knife fight. Trump knows how to win this type of fight. It’s why he’s doing well. When he bashes Kelly people stand-up and cheer.
and if you aren’t a trump supporter it’s bc you are pushing YOUR CANDIDATE. to this point I do not have a candidate, so that crap does not wash with me.
Trumps tactics are working for all of us, even for those of you who are uncomfortable with his style.
He may not be beloved by all but some of us are not looking this gift horse in the mouth.
I thought I was the only one that noticed. :)
Million Dollar legs
She is not too bright to keep this feud going. If he is polling at 30% it means that around 50% of her viewers support him and when she insults him she insults his supporters. Not a great strategy long term.
Pray America is waking
That was before Boehner and Mitch scr##ed us. Most of us hoped that someone maybe even Cruz would figure out what Trump was doing to garner all his support. He hasn't and neither have most of the Trump bashers here.
I have Beck on now and the Trump Bashers here are mimicking Beck, that should make us feel really strange.
I’m sure Conservatives were bashing Ronald Reagan in the 1950’s when he was a New Deal Democrat and a Union President.
Yeah, and inevitably someone will demand that you justify why you aren’t for Trump, as though there are no other choices.
The other day someone asked me just that and I took the time to explain. The response?
“But I don’t understand why you don’t support Trump.”
!!!!
THIS Trump detractor doesn't get his cues from Beck. I haven't listened to that show in years. I do my own research and have concluded Trump doesn't earn my trust.
Well, no.
Reagan was already espousing Conservative ideals by the mid-1950s. He supported Eisenhower's candidacy in 1956. And as for the New Deal, the great majority of the country supported it (rightly or wrongly) in the 1930s, so that's hardly a viable yardstick for measuring political ideology.
it’s as if we are from different planets because for the life of me I cannot understand how they DO support him. Yes, I know, the bluster, the braggadocio, the b@lls, are all appealing in light of the eunuchs we have had for so long, but I can’t vote just based on that. I can’t vote for someone just because they say I’d be great at that, I’d get along great with Putin, I’d be the best president for women that has ever been. Lots of form, very little substance, thus far.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.