Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

Because I have knowledge/training of/in Anti-submarine warfare, surface warfare, mine warfare, and air warfare projected by naval forces. I also have historical and technical knowledge on the subjects.
In addition to those knowledge sets I have insight into the capabilities of other country’s navies and the regions upon which they can project those capabilities.


53 posted on 08/24/2015 11:19:45 AM PDT by ExpatGator (I hate Illinois Nazis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: ExpatGator

So explain to me if we have more aircraft carriers than the rest of the world’s navies combined, more guided missile destroyers than the rest of the world’s navies combined, more nuclear submarines than the rest of the world’s navies combined, more amphibious helicopter ships, more landing ships, more auxiliary ships, more of just about anything else you can name, and taking into consideration that most of the rest of the world’s navies are on our side, then why do we need 350 ships? Are we expecting all the other navies except China and Russia to go out of business?


54 posted on 08/24/2015 11:30:09 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson