Posted on 08/21/2015 3:05:22 AM PDT by markomalley
What say you Justice Kennedy?
Without a doubt, he would disqualify authentically Christian churches from being legitimate religions worthy of 1st Amendment protections.
For individuals, he'd undoubtedly say that Christians have "freedom of conscience" as long as they keep it to themselves. But if they open their mouths, they need to be shipped to sensitivity training camps for re-education.
Stay calm and carry on.
Religious freedom, river spill, wildfires ...perhaps God is trying to get their attention. Just a thought.
They’d have to just throw me in jail before I would attend any forcd “diversity training” to sit there and be told that my religious principles are wrong, especially when they’re founded on thousands of years of Biblical interpretation.
close down. form a new corporation. re open.
Hurt feelings, maybe. Butthurt for sure.
Discrimination is the essence of life. It is a basic fundamental God given right. Without it...
For individuals, he'd undoubtedly say that Christians have "freedom of conscience" as long as they keep it to themselves. But if they open their mouths, they need to be shipped to sensitivity training camps for re-education.
Why are we always crying about the First Amendment for Christians. What if I simply have an objection to the unnatural perverse behavior of homosexuals. Don't I have a First Amendment right?
Exactly. I would have never let it get this far. My Dad ran a small business. One of his employees - on company time, in a company truck - decided to have a couple on the way back to the shop. Ended up DUI and wrecking the truck. He wanted Dad to pay workers comp for his injuries. Dad managed enough self control not to put him back in the hospital. But he told him in no uncertain terms (as a kid I learned a few new words) that he'd rather close the business immediately, that day, than pay that {deleted} one more dime.
43.0 grains H335 behind the 150 gr PSP bullet for 7.62 NATO.........
Pardon me. Still reloading here.
43.0 grains H335 behind the 150 gr PSP bullet for 7.62 NATO.........
Pardon me. Still reloading here.
Note well that the First Amendment does not protect just the right to believe as one chooses, but to engage in the free EXERCISE of one’s beliefs. So the ruling in Obergfell is constitutionally unsound since it in effect endorses the silent and unobtrusive framework of a belief system, but bars its actual practice.
There will be additional cases brought before the Court, arguing this thesis, and the decision will turn on whether the rights of an individual (or establishment) to practice his religion override the rights of other individuals to bugger each other and then force others to celebrate it.
I’ve read the US Constitution many times. I don’t recall seeing anything in it that states anyone has the right to not have their feelings hurt.
Of course the Constitution would have to matter once again for that to make a difference. Well news flash: IT MATTERS TO ME! So piss off liberal whiney ass wimps.
Did a quick word search on my text version of the Constitution.
Couldn’t find “hurt feelings” anywhere.
HA!
I’m stopping by their shop to pick up a cake tonight to be auctioned off at a GOP fundraiser tomorrow.
It might actually be worth going, especially if they pull the old line, “class confidentiality”. Give them both barrels of the gospel and make them kick you out.
“hurt feelings” are an element used by progressives to manufacture strategic “perception” as they seek to consolidate and strengthen their numbers in the corporate/collective environment.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-25/how-companies-are-using-pip-humiliate-and-get-rid-workers
How’s your body language?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.