Without a doubt, he would disqualify authentically Christian churches from being legitimate religions worthy of 1st Amendment protections.
For individuals, he'd undoubtedly say that Christians have "freedom of conscience" as long as they keep it to themselves. But if they open their mouths, they need to be shipped to sensitivity training camps for re-education.
For individuals, he'd undoubtedly say that Christians have "freedom of conscience" as long as they keep it to themselves. But if they open their mouths, they need to be shipped to sensitivity training camps for re-education.
Why are we always crying about the First Amendment for Christians. What if I simply have an objection to the unnatural perverse behavior of homosexuals. Don't I have a First Amendment right?