Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Well, it’s NOT - but from what I read they were 17 y.o. prostitutes and he was paying for it, versus stalking little kids. And, I’m sure, we’re not getting ALL of the story!

REALLY - it’s ALL wrong, but I guess since we’re splitting hairs here, I’d rather have that, then him abusing toddlers, you know?

Either way, the ICK FACTOR is waaaaaay too high!


67 posted on 08/20/2015 12:39:11 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Diana in Wisconsin
Well, it’s NOT - but from what I read they were 17 y.o. prostitutes and he was paying for it, versus stalking little kids. And, I’m sure, we’re not getting ALL of the story!

His sisters weren't 17 year old prostitutes.

In my state, you'd go to jail for using the services of a 17 year old prostitutes.

70 posted on 08/20/2015 12:42:08 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson