Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boycott

She leaves out one key feature....in 2008 and 2012....the absolute belief by the Democratic National Committee was that candidate Obama can not win, without Bill Clinton going into five or six key states and making speeches to the crowds. These were states where Obama didn’t have the numbers, but Bill Clinton won without any issues. Bill Clinton bent over backwards to make this work, and thought it’d be paid back in 2016 with Hillary running in a race with no real competition. Well....that’s the arrangement but with legal trouble....I don’t see how she wins now. Obama is paying back the national committee and the Clintons for the arrangements forced upon him.


11 posted on 08/20/2015 6:29:50 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice
Essentially, the Dem national committee has had two consecutive presidents, Clinton and now Obama that they could not control, and they too have huge reservations....

Obama has tendencies of being a complete communist in the African strain, rather than the Chicom strain. His Euro-centric crony capitalism can be, with a pen or his colorful constituents, taken away from big DNC donors making America into Amerika.

Obama is seen as a danger to be mitigated by the DNC and another Clinton would be just as disastrous for the Country. The Dem committee is at the levers of taking down Hillary, and mitigating the damage Obama is contemplating in making his Amerika; they prefer the America with capitalism under the guise of crony capitalism.

55 posted on 08/20/2015 7:07:18 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson