I have no objections against his candidacy at present. In a lot of respects I am happy about it because he has changed the narrative and reintroduced the word “illegal” to those blind bats of this country.
On the face of it, an Amendment to the Constitution CANNOT be Unconstitutional because it IS the Constitution.
That said, I understand what he means about it. It is all about the interpretation of the wording “....under the jurisdiction of....” is where I think liberals who want votes and RINOs and the CoC and bidness who want cheap labor have taken this amendment (meant for other reasons, BTW)that an effing illegal dropping a perpetual entitlement mouth to feed fits that intention.
Illegals, I’ll say it again - ILLEGALS, are not “under the jurisdiction of” except to the extent that they don’t belong here as citizens to start with and have no rights with respect to the regulation of ‘citizens’ except that they should be summarily thrown out. The only extension of this meaning would be ‘criminal’, ‘undesirable’ or ‘refuse’ that sure as heck isn’t anything connected with citizen in my book.
This amendment has had no real case concerning it’s bastardized interpretation to include illegal anchor babies. At some point it will. It is therefore our duty to make sure that a Bush, or a Clinton, or any other RINO never gets into that office lest he appoint some quisling RINO/Wise-whatever to the vacancy that decrepit senile RBG leaves when she gives it up.
Trump did not say what this headline is claiming.