[E. Pluribus Unum]

You don't get it. There are a whole lot of people who are fed up with milquetoast gentleman Republican candidates like Milt Romley who won't stand up for anything or confront anybody except for fellow Republicans that they consider to be "divisive."

I want somebody "divisive. I don't want my President getting along with Democrats and RINOs.

[trisham]

Amen to that.

[proust]

Yep. Nailed it.

[ForAmerica]

You called that one, right on, brother!

[samtheman]

I agree with post 12

[ru4liberty]

Your post doesn’t explain why Donald Trump should get to dictate to FOX or any other network whom they should fire and whom should they allow to remain employed.

[Parmy]

You don't get it. There are a whole lot of people who are fed up with milquetoast gentleman Republican candidates like Milt Romley who won't stand up for anything or confront anybody except for fellow Republicans that they consider to be "divisive." I want somebody "divisive. I don't want my President getting along with Democrats and RINOs.

After forty years of feminism that has been bent on emasculating American, it is refreshing to have someone stand up and slug it out with the neuters that inhabit the media.

[5th MEB]

Absolutely; time for some body, even if only semi-conservative to KICK ASS AND TAKE NAMES.
CRUZ FOR PRESIDENT! Mr. Trump can be vice pres.

[hopespringseternal]

Trump isn’t my guy, but he comes way ahead of the serial apologizers.

The only thing the RINOs are capable of defending is the status quo and liberal conventional wisdom. I am sick of politicians acting like they should get a CMH for pleasing the media.

[ru4liberty]

You don't get it. There are a whole lot of people who are fed up with milquetoast gentleman Republican candidates like Milt Romley who won't stand up for anything or confront anybody except for fellow Republicans that they consider to be "divisive."

I want somebody "divisive. I don't want my President getting along with Democrats and RINOs.

Who says I don't understand? Just because I haven't fallen for the Trump spectacle doesn't mean I like milquetoast Republicans. It doesn't even mean that I don't agree with many of the things Trump says. I resent the accusation that not to be a Trumpite means that I prefer a GOPe candidate. I'm not one who stayed home in 2012, but there's a good possibility of my doing so in 2016. And Trump is one of the several candidates who could make me do so. Besides, what's that got to do with Trump telling FOX to fire Luntz? A little focus here, huh?

---------------------------

You have not been paying attention.Luntz has is the problem

I'm paying full attention, my FRiend. You seem to equate my belief that Trump shouldn't be throwing his weight around regarding who is on a network's payroll with my approval or disapproval of Frank Luntz. It really doesn't matter how I feel about Luntz which is always subject to change. It matters that Trump is not only trying to leverage whether he'll run as a Republican or a 3rd party candidate, he's also trying to manipulate (leverage) media coverage. NO presidential candidate should be doing that.