And she's DEFINITELY out of the Dim race.
John R. Schindler is a security consultant and a former National Security Agency counterintelligence officer. He is on Twitter at @20committee.
she “has DECIDED to” —that’s funny...!
Wow, so nice of her, so generous..!
That’s ridiculous, that’s like after they slap the cuffs on you and bow you into the squad:
“I have authorized them to take me to jail, folks..! I have decided to sojourn to the station, per chance, yes....”
HAHAHAH...!
Wow, it’s like it’s impossible for her to say ANTHING without putting SOME type of deception, in there.
hahahhahahah..!
She had more than 900 FBI files when she was first lady. Chuck Colson went to prison for one. Nothing will come of this. Nothing ever does.
Does this mean that everything she deleted can be retrieved from the server?
Honestly this should sink anyone’s bid for any office. This is serious jail time stuff. These kinds of breaches endanger everyone in the United States.
Hillary should be going to jail... permanently, but because of stupid zero information voters and democrat lackeys in the Justice Department, she will probably win the Democrat nomination.
Nonsense. She will blame, deflect, and lie like always. For instance, she can say some underling removed the classification from the document before it hit her server, thus there is no way she could have known it was classified. This shows her denial about using it for classified stuff was the truth as she knew it, and how she is d”eeply troubled” that some poor staffer is looking at 20 years in jail for making such a “bad choice”. No crime, no conspiracy. Just watch her (and David Kendall).
Or if Warren gets into the race, it is over for Hillary said one pundit. Whatever; (wherever), no one could survive this, heck, that one retired military on fox, I forget his name, actually said Petraeus should have been sent to prison, I don’t know but he said that to show how serious this is with Clinton, it is probably worse.
BREAKING: State Dept Official to Fox News: Hillary INSIDER may have REMOVED ‘Top Secret’ markings
Fox News is reporting tonight that someone in the Hillary Clinton insider club may have tampered with ‘Top Secret’ documents by removing the markings that identified those documents as ‘Top Secret’, which would be a felony!
Watch:
I would like to know why a Federal Judge has not ordered the State Department to search ALL of the state department email accounts for any messages with a Clintonemail.com address?
Every person who used that email account for government business should be brought up on charges.
I’m just a low level schlub at NASA, and we get mandatory yearly training that explicitly states ‘Official Government Business may NOT be conducted on non-government computers.’
Come on people, how is a SOS going to function without dealing with a preponderance of classified information?
I find it interesting that Hillary has not been giving the protection last interactive elearning Lerner was given.
Clinton criminal network ping!
Hillary...too sloppy to be President.
Once more, ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, we have another Clinton who believes that a Clinton is way above the law, regardless if it’s committing perjury, failing to safeguard classified information, altering classified information, murder, rape, etc. This is the Clinton crime syndicate. Laws that when broken by the ordinary citizen result in fines and jail time do not apply to Clintons. Or, do they? We shall see. If Hillary slithers out of this one, our entire intelligence system and its safeguards have been irreparably damaged, since there will be no perceived consequences to violating the law.
I actually believe she’s too damned dumb to recognize what should be top secret and what shouldn’t.
However, ignorance of the law is no excuse. Least wise it’s never worked for me.
Why should the rich and powerful be exempt from the law?
Put Hill in prison for a long, long time.
With good behavior we can arrange conjugal visit from Huma.
DoD Components will develop, implement, and enforce procedures to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of classified information and controlled unclassified information (CUI) on DoD information systems, to include through compliance with References (a) through (i). DoD and Component-level guidance, policies, and training must include the following:
1. All authorized users ofDoD information systems (e.g., DoD civilian employees and military members, other federal agency personnel, DoD contractors), must understand and comply with policy and guidance to protect classified information and CUI, and to prevent unauthorized disclosures. DoD Components will ensure that appropriate requirements are applied to all authorized users (e.g., through DoD issuances, interagency agreements, acquisition regulations, contract requirements).
2. Classified information shall be processed only on information systems approved for such use at the required level of classification, in accordance with References (e), (f) and (i).
Additionally:
a. Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI)e.g., intelligence information marked with SI, TK, -or HCS handling caveats, shall be processed only on information systems specifically authorized for SCI processing. The Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS) is authorized and approved for processing information up to Top Secret/SCI.
b. The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET) is authorized for processing classified information up to collateral Secret only. SCI, regardless of its classification, may not be processed on, transferred to, or stored on SIPRNET, as that system is not authorized for SCI processing. ...
Spillages and unauthorized disclosures of classified information or CUI will be categorized in one of three categories:
• Willful. An incident is willful if the person purposefully disregards DoD security or information safeguarding policies or requirements (e.g., intentionally bypassing a known security control).
• Negligent. An incident is negligent if the person acted unreasonably in causing the spillage or unauthorized disclosure (e.g., a careless lack of attention to detail, or reckless disregard for proper procedures).
• Inadvertent. An incident is inadvertent if the person did not know, and had no reasonable basis to know, that the security violation or unauthorized disclosure was occurring (e.g., the person reasonably relied on improper markings).